Mike Jones: self-issued

Musings on Digital Identity

Category: Specifications Page 22 of 25

Updated JWT Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0

By

On July 6, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoI’ve updated the OAuth JWT Profile document to track minor changes to some of the underling documents. No normative changes were made.

The updated specification is available at:

Changes made were:

  • Tracked specification name changes: “The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol” to “The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework” and “OAuth 2.0 Assertion Profile” to “Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0”.
  • Merged in changes between draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-11 and draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-13. All changes were strictly editorial.

An HTML formatted version is available at:

Updated versions of JOSE and JWT specifications

By

On July 6, 2012

In Claims, Cryptography, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoNew versions of the JSON WEB {Signature,Encryption,Key,Algorithms,Token} (JWS, JWE, JWK, JWA, JWT) specifications have been released. These versions incorporate numerous suggestions from working group members and developers that clarify the intent of the specifications and make them easier to read and implement. In particular, the JWE spec now includes encryption and key derivation examples for a number of algorithms that have been verified in multiple independent implementations.

I’ve worked to close out all the former “TBD” items in the specs, bringing them up to an editorially complete state, in preparation for working group last call. As with previous releases, see the “Open Issues” sections for a small number of discussion points that I believe merit working group attention.

I also applied the changes made to the JOSE specs to the related individual submission JWS JSON Serialization and JWE JSON Serialization specs, which enable multiple recipients.

The working group specifications are available at:

The individual submission specifications are available at:

The document history entries (also in the specifications) are as follows:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-03

  • Added the cty (content type) header parameter for declaring type information about the secured content, as opposed to the typ (type) header parameter, which declares type information about this object.
  • Added “Collision Resistant Namespace” to the terminology section.
  • Reference ITU.X690.1994 for DER encoding.
  • Added an example JWS using ECDSA P-521 SHA-512. This has particular illustrative value because of the use of the 521 bit integers in the key and signature values. This is also an example in which the payload is not a base64url encoded JSON object.
  • Added an example x5c value.
  • No longer say “the UTF-8 representation of the JWS Secured Input (which is the same as the ASCII representation)”. Just call it “the ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input”.
  • Added Registration Template sections for defined registries.
  • Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
  • Changed name of the JSON Web Signature and Encryption “typ” Values registry to be the JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry, since it is used for more than just values of the typ parameter.
  • Moved registries JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters and JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values to the JWS specification.
  • Numerous editorial improvements.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-03

  • Added the kdf (key derivation function) header parameter to provide crypto agility for key derivation. The default KDF remains the Concat KDF with the SHA-256 digest function.
  • Reordered encryption steps so that the Encoded JWE Header is always created before it is needed as an input to the AEAD “additional authenticated data” parameter.
  • Added the cty (content type) header parameter for declaring type information about the secured content, as opposed to the typ (type) header parameter, which declares type information about this object.
  • Moved description of how to determine whether a header is for a JWS or a JWE from the JWT spec to the JWE spec.
  • Added complete encryption examples for both AEAD and non-AEAD algorithms.
  • Added complete key derivation examples.
  • Added “Collision Resistant Namespace” to the terminology section.
  • Reference ITU.X690.1994 for DER encoding.
  • Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
  • Numerous editorial improvements.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-03

  • Clarified that kid values need not be unique within a JWK Set.
  • Moved JSON Web Key Parameters registry to the JWK specification.
  • Added “Collision Resistant Namespace” to the terminology section.
  • Changed registration requirements from RFC Required to Specification Required with Expert Review.
  • Added Registration Template sections for defined registries.
  • Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
  • Numerous editorial improvements.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-03

  • Always use a 128 bit “authentication tag” size for AES GCM, regardless of the key size.
  • Specified that use of a 128 bit IV is REQUIRED with AES CBC. It was previously RECOMMENDED.
  • Removed key size language for ECDSA algorithms, since the key size is implied by the algorithm being used.
  • Stated that the int key size must be the same as the hash output size (and not larger, as was previously allowed) so that its size is defined for key generation purposes.
  • Added the kdf (key derivation function) header parameter to provide crypto agility for key derivation. The default KDF remains the Concat KDF with the SHA-256 digest function.
  • Clarified that the mod and exp values are unsigned.
  • Added Implementation Requirements columns to algorithm tables and Implementation Requirements entries to algorithm registries.
  • Changed AES Key Wrap to RECOMMENDED.
  • Moved registries JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters and JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values to the JWS specification.
  • Moved JSON Web Key Parameters registry to the JWK specification.
  • Changed registration requirements from RFC Required to Specification Required with Expert Review.
  • Added Registration Template sections for defined registries.
  • Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
  • No longer say “the UTF-8 representation of the JWS Secured Input (which is the same as the ASCII representation)”. Just call it “the ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input”.
  • Added “Collision Resistant Namespace” to the terminology section.
  • Numerous editorial improvements.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-01

  • Added the cty (content type) header parameter for declaring type information about the secured content, as opposed to the typ (type) header parameter, which declares type information about this object. This significantly simplified nested JWTs.
  • Moved description of how to determine whether a header is for a JWS or a JWE from the JWT spec to the JWE spec.
  • Changed registration requirements from RFC Required to Specification Required with Expert Review.
  • Added Registration Template sections for defined registries.
  • Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
  • Added “Collision Resistant Namespace” to the terminology section.
  • Numerous editorial improvements.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-signature-json-serialization-02

  • Tracked editorial changes made to the JWS spec.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-encryption-json-serialization-02

  • Updated examples to track updated algorithm properties in the JWA spec.
  • Tracked editorial changes made to the JWE spec.

HTML formatted versions are available at:

Special thanks to Axel Nennker, Emmanuel Raviart, Brian Campbell, and Edmund Jay for validating the JWE examples!

OAuth Core -28 and Bearer -21 Specifications

By

On June 19, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoOAuth Core draft -28 has been published. Changes were:

  • Updated the ABNF in the manner discussed by the working group, allowing username and password to be Unicode and restricting client_id and client_secret to ASCII.
  • Specifies the use of the application/x-www-form-urlencoded content-type encoding method to encode the client_id when used as the password for HTTP Basic.

OAuth Bearer draft -21 has also been published. Changes were:

  • Changed “NOT RECOMMENDED” to “not recommended” in caveat about the URI Query Parameter method.
  • Changed “other specifications may extend this specification for use with other transport protocols” to “other specifications may extend this specification for use with other protocols”.
  • Changed Acknowledgements to use only ASCII characters, per the RFC style guide.

The drafts are available at:

HTML-formatted versions are available at:

Thanks to Eran Hammer for approving the Core draft posting.

OAuth Core -27 and Bearer -20 Specifications

By

On June 18, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoOn June 8, draft 27 of the OAuth 2.0 Authorization Specification and draft 20 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification were published. They addressed DISCUSS issues and COMMENTs raised for these specifications during IESG review.

Changes made to draft-ietf-oauth-v2 were:

  • Added character set restrictions for error, error_description, and error_uri parameters consistent with the OAuth Bearer spec.
  • Added “resource access error response” as an error usage location in the OAuth Extensions Error Registry.
  • Added an ABNF for all message elements.
  • Corrected editorial issues identified during review.

Changes made to draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer were:

  • Added caveat about using a reserved query parameter name being counter to URI namespace best practices.
  • Specified use of Cache-Control options when using the URI Query Parameter method.
  • Changed title to “The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: Bearer Token Usage”.
  • Referenced syntax definitions for the scope, error, error_description, and error_uri parameters in the OAuth 2.0 core spec.
  • Registered the invalid_request, invalid_token, and insufficient_scope error values in the OAuth Extensions Error Registry.
  • Acknowledged additional individuals.

The drafts are available at:

HTML-formatted versions are available at:

Initial Standards Track JSON Web Token (JWT) Specifications

By

On May 23, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, Specifications

IETF logoThe JSON Web Token (JWT) specification and the OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Token Profiles specification are now IETF standards track documents in the OAuth working group. These versions are based upon the individual submission versions draft-jones-json-web-token-10 and draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer-04 with no normative changes. The JWT specification builds upon the JWS, JWE, JWK, and JWA specifications in the JOSE working group.

These specifications are available at:

HTML formatted versions are available at:

JSON Crypto Specs Draft -02: JWS, JWE, JWK, JWA and JSON Web Token (JWT) Draft -10

By

On May 14, 2012

In Claims, Cryptography, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoJSON Crypto Specs Draft -02: JWS, JWE, JWK, JWA and JSON Web Token (JWT) Draft -10

New -02 versions of the JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) specifications are now available that incorporate working group decisions made since the previous versions, including decisions made at IETF 83 in Paris and in follow-up discussions on the JOSE working group list. The drafts contain numerous clarifications, refinements, and editorial improvements. They are:

  • JSON Web Signature (JWS) — Digital signature/HMAC specification
  • JSON Web Encryption (JWE) — Encryption specification
  • JSON Web Key (JWK) — Public key specification
  • JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) — Algorithms and identifiers specification

Also, Draft -10 of the JSON Web Token (JWT) specification has been published. It uses the -02 versions of the JOSE specifications and contains parallel editorial changes to those applied to the JOSE specs.

These specifications are available at:

The document history entries (also in the specifications) are as follows:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-02:

  • Clarified that it is an error when a kid value is included and no matching key is found.
  • Removed assumption that kid (key ID) can only refer to an asymmetric key.
  • Clarified that JWSs with duplicate Header Parameter Names MUST be rejected.
  • Clarified the relationship between typ header parameter values and MIME types.
  • Registered application/jws MIME type and “JWS” typ header parameter value.
  • Simplified JWK terminology to get replace the “JWK Key Object” and “JWK Container Object” terms with simply “JSON Web Key (JWK)” and “JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set)” and to eliminate potential confusion between single keys and sets of keys. As part of this change, the header parameter name for a public key value was changed from jpk (JSON Public Key) to jwk (JSON Web Key).
  • Added suggestion on defining additional header parameters such as x5t#S256 in the future for certificate thumbprints using hash algorithms other than SHA-1.
  • Specify RFC 2818 server identity validation, rather than RFC 6125 (paralleling the same decision in the OAuth specs).
  • Generalized language to refer to Message Authentication Codes (MACs) rather than Hash-based Message Authentication Codes (HMACs) unless in a context specific to HMAC algorithms.
  • Reformatted to give each header parameter its own section heading.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-02:

  • When using AEAD algorithms (such as AES GCM), use the “additional authenticated data” parameter to provide integrity for the header, encrypted key, and ciphertext and use the resulting “authentication tag” value as the JWE Integrity Value.
  • Defined KDF output key sizes.
  • Generalized text to allow key agreement to be employed as an alternative to key wrapping or key encryption.
  • Changed compression algorithm from gzip to DEFLATE.
  • Clarified that it is an error when a kid value is included and no matching key is found.
  • Clarified that JWEs with duplicate Header Parameter Names MUST be rejected.
  • Clarified the relationship between typ header parameter values and MIME types.
  • Registered application/jwe MIME type and “JWE” typ header parameter value.
  • Simplified JWK terminology to get replace the “JWK Key Object” and “JWK Container Object” terms with simply “JSON Web Key (JWK)” and “JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set)” and to eliminate potential confusion between single keys and sets of keys. As part of this change, the header parameter name for a public key value was changed from jpk (JSON Public Key) to jwk (JSON Web Key).
  • Added suggestion on defining additional header parameters such as x5t#S256 in the future for certificate thumbprints using hash algorithms other than SHA-1.
  • Specify RFC 2818 server identity validation, rather than RFC 6125 (paralleling the same decision in the OAuth specs).
  • Generalized language to refer to Message Authentication Codes (MACs) rather than Hash-based Message Authentication Codes (HMACs) unless in a context specific to HMAC algorithms.
  • Reformatted to give each header parameter its own section heading.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-02:

  • Simplified JWK terminology to get replace the “JWK Key Object” and “JWK Container Object” terms with simply “JSON Web Key (JWK)” and “JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set)” and to eliminate potential confusion between single keys and sets of keys. As part of this change, the top-level member name for a set of keys was changed from jwk to keys.
  • Clarified that values with duplicate member names MUST be rejected.
  • Established JSON Web Key Set Parameters registry.
  • Explicitly listed non-goals in the introduction.
  • Moved algorithm-specific definitions from JWK to JWA.
  • Reformatted to give each member definition its own section heading.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-02:

  • For AES GCM, use the “additional authenticated data” parameter to provide integrity for the header, encrypted key, and ciphertext and use the resulting “authentication tag” value as the JWE Integrity Value.
  • Defined minimum required key sizes for algorithms without specified key sizes.
  • Defined KDF output key sizes.
  • Specified the use of PKCS #5 padding with AES-CBC.
  • Generalized text to allow key agreement to be employed as an alternative to key wrapping or key encryption.
  • Clarified that ECDH-ES is a key agreement algorithm.
  • Required implementation of AES-128-KW and AES-256-KW.
  • Removed the use of A128GCM and A256GCM for key wrapping.
  • Removed A512KW since it turns out that it’s not a standard algorithm.
  • Clarified the relationship between typ header parameter values and MIME types.
  • Generalized language to refer to Message Authentication Codes (MACs) rather than Hash-based Message Authentication Codes (HMACs) unless in a context specific to HMAC algorithms.
  • Established registries: JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters, JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms, JSON Web Signature and Encryption “typ” Values, JSON Web Key Parameters, and JSON Web Key Algorithm Families.
  • Moved algorithm-specific definitions from JWK to JWA.
  • Reformatted to give each member definition its own section heading.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token-10:

  • Clarified the relationship between typ header parameter values, typ claim values, and MIME types.
  • Clarified that JWTs with duplicate Header Parameter Names or Duplicate Claim names MUST be rejected.
  • Required implementation of AES-128-KW and AES-256-KW when the implementation provides encryption capabilities.
  • Registered “JWT” typ header parameter value.
  • Generalized language to refer to Message Authentication Codes (MACs) rather than Hash-based Message Authentication Codes (HMACs) unless in a context specific to HMAC algorithms.
  • Reformatted to give each claim definition and header parameter its own section heading.

HTML formatted versions are available at:

JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft -09

By

On May 8, 2012

In Claims, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoDraft 09 of the JSON Web Token (JWT) specification has been published. It contains this change:

  • Changed “http://openid.net/specs/jwt/1.0” to “urn:ietf:params:oauth:token-type:jwt” in preparation for OAuth WG draft.

This specification is available at:

An HTML formatted version is available at:

OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Token Profiles Specification Draft -04

By

On April 26, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoDraft 04 of the OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Token Profiles Specification has been published. This version tracks changes in the OAuth 2.0 Assertion Profile and SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 specifications made in response to working group last call comments, as announced by Brian Campbell.

Changes made were:

  • Merged in changes between draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-09 and draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-11.
  • Added the optional iat (issued at) claim, which was already present in the JWT spec.

The draft is available at:

An HTML-formatted version is available at:

OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -19

By

On April 24, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoDraft 19 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification has been published. It addresses DISCUSS issues and COMMENTs raised for which resolutions have been agreed to. No normative changes were made. Changes made were:

  • Use ABNF from RFC 5234.
  • Added sentence “The Bearer authentication scheme is intended primarily for server authentication using the WWW-Authenticate and Authorization HTTP headers, but does not preclude its use for proxy authentication” to the introduction.
  • In the introduction, state that this document also imposes semantic requirements upon the access token.
  • Reference the scope definition in the OAuth core spec.
  • Added scope examples.
  • Reference RFC 6265 for security considerations about cookies.

The draft is available at:

An HTML-formatted version is available at:

OpenID Connect has won the 2012 European Identity Award

By

On April 18, 2012

In Claims, Events, JSON, OAuth, Specifications

OpenID logoI’m thrilled to report that OpenID Connect has won the 2012 European Identity Award for Best Innovation/New Standard. I appreciate the recognition of what we’ve achieved to date with OpenID Connect and its potential to significantly change digital identity for the better. As Dave Kearns wrote in the OpenID Foundation announcement about the award:

I’m pleased that Kuppinger Cole has granted OpenID Connect the award for Best Innovation/New Standard this year. What’s most impressive is that this elegantly simple design resulted from the cooperation of such a diverse global set of contributors. I expect OpenID Connect to have a substantial positive impact on usable, secure identity solutions both for traditional computing platforms and mobile devices. My congratulations to the OpenID Foundation!

My thanks to all who have contributed to the OpenID Connect specifications to date and especially to the developers who have implemented draft versions, providing essential feedback needed to refine the specs on the road to final standards. I look forward to seeing what people will accomplish with OpenID Connect!

April 10, 2012 OpenID Connect Update Release

By

On April 13, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, OpenID, Specifications

OpenID logoThe OpenID Connect working group has released an update to the OpenID Connect specifications that continues incorporating significant developer feedback received, while maintaining as much compatibility with the implementer’s drafts as possible. The Connect specs have also been updated to track updates to the OAuth and JOSE specs, which they use. The primary normative changes are as follows:

  • Make changes to allow path in the issuer_identifier, per issue #513
  • Add hash and hash check of access_token and code to id_token, per issue #510
  • Split encrypted response configurations into separate parameters for alg, enc, int
  • Added optional id_token to authorization request parameters, per issue #535
  • Now requested claims add to those requested with scope values, rather than replacing them, per issue #547
  • Added error interaction_required and removed user_mismatched, per issue #523
  • Changed invalid_request_redirect_uri to invalid_redirect_uri, per issue #553
  • Removed “embedded” display type, since its semantics were not well defined, per issue #514

A significant non-normative addition is:

  • Add example JS code for Basic client

Implementers are particularly encouraged to build and provide feedback on the new and modified features.

The new versions are available from http://openid.net/connect/ or at:

JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft -08

By

On March 12, 2012

In Claims, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoDraft 08 of the JSON Web Token (JWT) specification has been published. It uses the -01 versions of the JOSE specifications and also contains these changes:

  • Removed language that required that a JWT must have three parts. Now the number of parts is explicitly dependent upon the representation of the underlying JWS or JWE.
  • Moved the “alg”:”none” definition to the JWS spec.
  • Registered the application/jwt MIME Media Type.
  • Clarified that the order of the creation and validation steps is not significant in cases where there are no dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps.
  • Corrected the Magic Signatures and Simple Web Token (SWT) references.

This specification is available at:

An HTML formatted version is available at:

Draft -01 of JSON Crypto Specs: JWS, JWE, JWK, JWA, JWS-JS, JWE-JS

By

On March 12, 2012

In Cryptography, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoNew versions of the IETF JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) specifications are now available that incorporate working group feedback since publication of the initial versions. They are:

  • JSON Web Signature (JWS) — Digital signature/HMAC specification
  • JSON Web Encryption (JWE) — Encryption specification
  • JSON Web Key (JWK) — Public key specification
  • JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) — Algorithms and identifiers specification

The most important changes are:

  • Added a separate integrity check for encryption algorithms without an integral integrity check.
  • Defined header parameters for including JWK public keys and X.509 certificate chains directly in the header.

See the Document History section in each specification for a more detailed list of changes.

Corresponding versions of the JSON Serialization specs, which use these JOSE drafts, are also available. Besides using JSON Serializations of the cryptographic results (rather than Compact Serializations using a series of base64url encoded values), these specifications also enable multiple digital signatures and/or HMACs to applied to the same message and enable the same plaintext to be encrypted to multiple recipients. They are:

  • JSON Web Signature JSON Serialization (JWS-JS)
  • JSON Web Encryption JSON Serialization (JWE-JS)

These specifications are available at:

HTML formatted versions are available at:

OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -18

By

On March 12, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoDraft 18 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification has been published. It contains the following changes:

  • Changed example bearer token value from vF9dft4qmT to mF_9.B5f-4.1JqM.
  • Added example access token response returning a Bearer token.

The draft is available at:

An HTML-formatted version is available at:

JSON Serializations for JWS and JWE

By

On March 5, 2012

In Cryptography, JSON, Specifications

IETF logoParticipants in the JOSE working group have described use cases where a JSON top-level representation of digitally signed, HMAC’ed, or encrypted content is desirable. They have also described use cases where multiple digital signatures and/or HMACs need to applied to the same message and where the same plaintext needs to be encrypted to multiple recipients.

Responding to those use cases and working group input, I have created two new brief specifications:

  • JSON Web Signature JSON Serialization (JWS-JS)
  • JSON Web Encryption JSON Serialization (JWE-JS)

These use the same cryptographic operations as JWS and JWE, but serialize the results into a JSON objects, rather than a set of base64url encoded values separated by periods (as is done for JWS and JWE to produce compact, URL-safe representations).

These drafts are available at:

HTML-formatted versions are available at:

Feedback welcome!

OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -17

By

On February 17, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoDraft 17 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification has been published. This version changes the RFCs referenced for certificate chain verification. The wording was proposed by Alexey Melnikov as part of the Gen-ART review.

It contains the following changes:

  • Restore RFC 2818 reference for server identity verification and add RFC 5280 reference for certificate revocation lists, per Gen-ART review comments.

The draft is available at:

An HTML-formatted version is available at:

OpenID Connect Interop in Progress

By

On February 17, 2012

In Claims, Events, Interoperability, JSON, OAuth, OpenID, Specifications

OSIS logoOpenID logoThe Third OpenID Connect Interop is currently under way — this time based upon approved Implementer’s Drafts. Currently 7 implementations are being tested, with I believe more to be added. The interop is designed to enable people to test the implementations they’ve built against other implementations and verify that specific features that they’ve built are working correctly. This has several benefits: it helps debug implementations, it helps debug the specifications, and it results in greater interoperability among OpenID Connect implementations.

As background, like the other OSIS interops, the OpenID Connect interop is an opportunity for implementers to try their code against one another’s in a systematic way. It is not a conformance test; participants do not “pass” or “fail”. There is no requirement that you must support particular features to participate or that you must participate in all aspects of the interop.

If you’d like to participate in the interop, join the OpenID Connect Interop mailing list and send us a note there saying who your interop contact person will be, the name of your organization (can be an individual), the name of your implementation (can be your name), and a list of the online testing endpoints for your implementation. Testing is performed online on your schedule, with results recorded on the interop wiki. That being said, an in-person meeting of interop participants will also be held on Friday, March 2 in San Francisco (the week of RSA) for those who are able to attend.

OpenID Connect Implementer’s Drafts Approved

By

On February 17, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, OpenID, Specifications

OpenID logoThe OpenID Foundation members have overwhelmingly voted to approve the OpenID Connect specifications as Implementer’s Drafts. This is an important milestone in the process of completing the OpenID Connect specifications.

Implementer’s Drafts are stable versions of specifications intended for trial implementations and deployments that provide specific IPR protections to those using them. Implementers and deployers are encouraged to continue to provide timely feedback to the working group on the specifications based upon their experiences with them.

Vote to Approve OpenID Connect Implementer’s Drafts Under Way

By

On February 8, 2012

In Claims, JSON, OAuth, OpenID, Specifications

OpenID logoThe vote to approve six OpenID Connect specification drafts as OpenID Foundation Implementer’s Drafts is under way. To vote, go to https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/62 and log in using your OpenID by the morning of Wednesday, February 15th. For more information about OpenID Connect, visit http://openid.net/connect/.

OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification Draft -16

By

On January 30, 2012

In OAuth, Specifications

OAuth logoDraft 16 of the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Specification has been published. This version contains a proposed resolution to the auth-param syntax issue that has been reviewed by Julian Reschke, Mark Nottingham, and the OAuth WG chairs. It also addresses the Gen-ART review comments by Alexey Melnikov.

It contains the following changes:

  • Use the HTTPbis auth-param syntax for Bearer challenge attributes.
  • Dropped the sentence “The realm value is intended for programmatic use and is not meant to be displayed to end users”.
  • Reordered form-encoded body parameter description bullets for better readability.
  • Added [USASCII] reference.

The draft is available at:

An HTML-formatted version is available at:

Page 22 of 25

Previous

Next

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén