{"id":1695,"date":"2017-06-05T18:27:57","date_gmt":"2017-06-06T01:27:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/?p=1695"},"modified":"2017-06-05T18:27:57","modified_gmt":"2017-06-06T01:27:57","slug":"cbor-web-token-cwt-specification-addressing-wglc-feedback","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/?p=1695","title":{"rendered":"CBOR Web Token (CWT) specification addressing WGLC feedback"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"plain\"><img decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" src=\"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/images\/ietf-logo.png\" alt=\"IETF logo\"\/><\/span>A new CBOR Web Token (CWT) draft has been published that addresses the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) feedback received.  Changes were:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Say that CWT is derived from JWT, rather than CWT is a profile of JWT.<\/li>\n<li>Used CBOR type names in descriptions, rather than major\/minor type numbers.<\/li>\n<li>Clarified the NumericDate and StringOrURI descriptions.<\/li>\n<li>Changed to allow CWT claim names to use values of any legal CBOR map key type.<\/li>\n<li>Changed to use the CWT tag to identify nested CWTs instead of the CWT content type.<\/li>\n<li>Added an example using a floating-point date value.<\/li>\n<li>Acknowledged reviewers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Thanks to Samuel Erdtman for doing the majority of the editing for this draft.  As always, people are highly encouraged to validate the examples.<\/p>\n<p>The specification is available at:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tools.ietf.org\/html\/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-05\">https:\/\/tools.ietf.org\/html\/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-05<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>An HTML-formatted version is also available at:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/docs\/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-05.html\">https:\/\/self-issued.info\/docs\/draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-05.html<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new CBOR Web Token (CWT) draft has been published that addresses the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) feedback received. Changes were: Say that CWT is derived from JWT, rather than CWT is a profile of JWT. Used CBOR type names in descriptions, rather than major\/minor type numbers. Clarified the NumericDate and StringOrURI descriptions. Changed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,8,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cbor","category-claims","category-specifications"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1695"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1696,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695\/revisions\/1696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/self-issued.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}