JSON Web Signature (JWS)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/Ping Identityve7jtb@ve7jtb.comNomura Research Instituten-sakimura@nri.co.jp
Security
JOSE Working GroupRFCRequest for CommentsI-DInternet-DraftJavaScript Object NotationJSONJSON Web TokenJWTJSON Web SignatureJWSJSON Web EncryptionJWEJSON Web KeyJWKJSON Web AlgorithmsJWA
JSON Web Signature (JWS) is a means of
representing content secured with digital signatures or
Message Authentication Codes (MACs)
using JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) data structures.
Cryptographic algorithms and identifiers for use with this
specification are described in the separate
JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification.
Related encryption capabilities are described in the separate
JSON Web Encryption (JWE) specification.
JSON Web Signature (JWS) is a compact format for
representing content secured with digital signatures or
Message Authentication Codes (MACs)
intended for space constrained environments such as HTTP
Authorization headers and URI query parameters.
It represents this content using JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)
data structures.
The JWS cryptographic mechanisms provide integrity protection for
arbitrary sequences of bytes.
Cryptographic algorithms and identifiers for use with this
specification are described in the separate
JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification.
Related encryption capabilities are described in the separate
JSON Web Encryption (JWE) specification.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels .
A data structure cryptographically securing a JWS Header
and a JWS Payload with a JWS Signature value.
A string representing a JSON object that describes the
digital signature or MAC operation applied to
create the JWS Signature value.
The bytes to be secured - a.k.a., the message.
The payload can contain an arbitrary sequence of bytes.
A byte array containing the cryptographic
material that secures the JWS Header
and the JWS Payload.
Base64url encoding of the bytes of the
UTF-8
representation of the JWS Header.
Base64url encoding of the JWS Payload.
Base64url encoding of the JWS Signature.
The concatenation of the Encoded JWS Header, a period ('.')
character, and the Encoded JWS Payload.
The name of a member of the JSON object representing a
JWS Header.
The value of a member of the JSON object representing a
JWS Header.
A representation of the JWS as the concatenation of the
Encoded JWS Header, the Encoded JWS Payload, and the
Encoded JWS Signature in that order, with the three
strings being separated by period ('.') characters.
For the purposes of this specification, this term always
refers to the URL- and filename-safe Base64 encoding
described in RFC 4648,
Section 5, with the (non URL-safe) '=' padding characters
omitted, as permitted by Section 3.2. (See for notes on implementing
base64url encoding without padding.)
A namespace that allows names to be allocated in a manner
such that they are highly unlikely to collide with other names.
For instance, collision resistance can be achieved through
administrative delegation of portions of the namespace or
through use of collision-resistant name allocation functions.
Examples of Collision Resistant Namespaces include:
Domain Names,
Object Identifiers (OIDs) as defined in the ITU-T X.660
and X.670 Recommendation series, and
Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs)
.
When using an administratively delegated namespace,
the definer of a name needs to take
reasonable precautions to ensure they are in control of
the portion of the namespace they use to define the name.
A JSON string value, with the additional requirement that
while arbitrary string values MAY be used, any value
containing a ":" character MUST be a URI
.
JWS represents digitally signed or MACed content using JSON data
structures and base64url encoding. The representation
consists of three parts: the JWS Header, the JWS Payload,
and the JWS Signature.
In the Compact Serialization, the three parts are
base64url-encoded for transmission, and represented
as the concatenation of the encoded strings in that order,
with the three strings being separated by period ('.')
characters.
(A JSON Serialization for this information is defined in the separate
JSON Web Signature JSON Serialization (JWS-JS)
specification.)
The JWS Header describes the signature or MAC method and parameters employed.
The JWS Payload is the message content to be secured.
The JWS Signature ensures the integrity of
both the JWS Header and the JWS Payload.
The following example JWS Header declares that the
encoded object is a JSON Web Token (JWT)
and the JWS Header and the JWS Payload are
secured using the HMAC SHA-256 algorithm:
Base64url encoding the bytes of the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header yields this Encoded JWS Header value:
The following is an example of a JSON object that can be
used as a JWS Payload. (Note that the payload can be any
content, and need not be a representation of a JSON object.)
Base64url encoding the bytes of the UTF-8 representation of the JSON
object yields the following Encoded JWS Payload
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
Computing the HMAC of the bytes of the ASCII
representation of the JWS Secured Input
(the concatenation of the Encoded JWS Header, a period ('.')
character, and the Encoded JWS Payload)
with the HMAC SHA-256 algorithm
using the key specified in
and base64url encoding the result
yields this Encoded JWS Signature value:
Concatenating these parts in the order
Header.Payload.Signature with period characters between the
parts yields this complete JWS representation
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
This computation is illustrated in more detail in .
The members of the JSON object represented by the JWS Header describe the
digital signature or MAC applied to the
Encoded JWS Header and the Encoded JWS Payload and optionally
additional properties of the JWS.
The Header Parameter Names within this object MUST be unique;
JWSs with duplicate Header Parameter Names MUST be rejected.
Implementations MUST understand the entire contents of the
header; otherwise, the JWS MUST be rejected.
There are three classes of Header Parameter Names:
Reserved Header Parameter Names, Public Header Parameter Names,
and Private Header Parameter Names.
The following header parameter names are reserved
with meanings as defined below. All
the names are short because a core goal of JWSs is for the
representations to be compact.
Additional reserved header parameter names MAY be defined
via the IANA
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry
.
As indicated by the common registry, JWSs and JWEs share a
common header parameter space; when a parameter is used by
both specifications, its usage must be compatible
between the specifications.
The alg (algorithm) header
parameter identifies the cryptographic algorithm used to
secure the JWS.
The algorithm specified by the alg value
MUST be supported by the implementation
and there MUST be a key for use with that algorithm associated with the
party that digitally signed or MACed the content
or the JWS MUST be rejected.
The alg value is case sensitive.
Its value MUST be a string containing a StringOrURI value.
This header parameter is REQUIRED.
A list of defined alg values for use with
JWS is presented in Section 3.1 of the
JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification.
alg values SHOULD either be
registered in the IANA
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry
or be
a URI that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace.
The jku (JWK Set URL)
header parameter is a URI that refers to a
resource for a set of JSON-encoded public keys, one of
which corresponds to the key used to
digitally sign the JWS.
The keys MUST be encoded as a JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set) .
The protocol used to acquire the resource MUST provide
integrity protection; an HTTP GET request to retrieve the
certificate MUST use TLS ;
the identity of the server MUST be validated, as per
Section 3.1 of HTTP Over TLS .
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
The jwk (JSON Web Key)
header parameter is a public key that corresponds to the key used to
digitally sign the JWS.
This key is represented as a JSON Web Key .
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
The x5u (X.509 URL) header
parameter is a URI that refers to a resource for
the X.509 public key certificate or certificate chain
corresponding to the key used to
digitally sign the JWS.
The identified resource MUST provide a representation of
the certificate or certificate chain that conforms to
RFC 5280 in PEM encoded form
.
The certificate containing the public key of the entity
that digitally signed the JWS MUST be the first certificate. This MAY
be followed by additional certificates, with each
subsequent certificate being the one used to certify the
previous one.
The protocol used to acquire the resource MUST provide
integrity protection; an HTTP GET request to retrieve the
certificate MUST use TLS ;
the identity of the server MUST be validated, as per
Section 3.1 of HTTP Over TLS .
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
The x5t (X.509 Certificate Thumbprint)
header parameter provides a base64url encoded
SHA-1 thumbprint (a.k.a. digest) of the DER encoding of
the X.509 certificate corresponding to the key used to
digitally sign the JWS.
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
If, in the future, certificate thumbprints need to be
computed using hash functions other than SHA-1, it is
suggested that additional related header parameters be
defined for that purpose. For example, it is suggested
that a new x5t#S256 (X.509
Certificate Thumbprint using SHA-256) header parameter
could be defined by registering it in the IANA
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters
registry .
The x5c (X.509 Certificate Chain)
header parameter contains the X.509 public key
certificate or certificate chain
corresponding to the key used to
digitally sign the JWS.
The certificate or certificate chain is represented as an
array of certificate values. Each value is a
base64 encoded ( Section 4 - not base64url encoded)
DER PKIX certificate value.
The certificate containing the public key of the entity
that digitally signed the JWS MUST be the first certificate. This MAY
be followed by additional certificates, with each
subsequent certificate being the one used to certify the
previous one.
The recipient MUST verify the certificate chain according
to and reject the JWS if any
validation failure occurs.
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
See for an example
x5c value.
The kid (key ID) header
parameter is a hint indicating which key was used to
secure the JWS.
This parameter allows originators to explicitly signal a change of
key to recipients.
Should the recipient be unable to locate a key
corresponding to the kid
value, they SHOULD treat that condition as an error.
The interpretation of the
kid value is unspecified.
Its value MUST be a string.
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
When used with a JWK, the kid
value MAY be used to match a JWK kid
parameter value.
The typ (type) header
parameter is used to declare the type of this object.
The type value JWS MAY be used
to indicate that this object is a JWS.
The typ value is case sensitive.
Its value MUST be a string.
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
MIME Media Type
values MAY be used as typ values.
typ values SHOULD either be
registered in the IANA
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry
or be
a URI that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace.
The cty (content type) header
parameter is used to declare the type of the secured
content (the Payload).
The cty value is case sensitive.
Its value MUST be a string.
This header parameter is OPTIONAL.
The values used for the cty
header parameter come from the same value space as the
typ header parameter,
with the same rules applying.
Additional header parameter names can be defined by those
using JWSs. However, in order to prevent collisions, any new
header parameter name SHOULD either be registered in the IANA
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry
or be
a URI that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace.
In each case, the definer of the name
or value needs to take reasonable precautions to make sure they
are in control of the part of the namespace they use to
define the header parameter name.
New header parameters should be introduced sparingly, as
they can result in non-interoperable JWSs.
A producer and consumer of a JWS may agree to any header
parameter name that is not a Reserved Name or a Public
Name . Unlike Public
Names, these private names are subject to collision and
should be used with caution.
To create a JWS, one MUST perform these steps. The order of
the steps is not significant in cases where there are no
dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps.
Create the content to be used as the JWS Payload.
Base64url encode the bytes of the JWS Payload. This
encoding becomes the Encoded JWS Payload.
Create a JWS Header containing the desired set of header
parameters. Note that white space is explicitly allowed
in the representation and no canonicalization need be performed
before encoding.
Base64url encode the bytes of the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header to create the Encoded JWS Header.
Compute the JWS Signature in the manner defined for
the particular algorithm being used. The JWS Secured Input
is always the concatenation of the Encoded JWS Header,
a period ('.') character, and the Encoded JWS Payload.
The alg (algorithm) header parameter MUST be
present in the JSON Header, with the algorithm value
accurately representing the algorithm used to construct
the JWS Signature.
Base64url encode the representation of the JWS Signature
to create the Encoded JWS Signature.
The three encoded parts, taken together, are the result.
The Compact Serialization of this result is the
concatenation of the Encoded JWS Header, the Encoded JWS
Payload, and the Encoded JWS Signature in that order, with
the three strings being separated by period ('.')
characters.
When validating a JWS, the following steps MUST be taken. The
order of the steps is not significant in cases where there are
no dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps.
If any of the listed steps fails, then the JWS MUST be
rejected.
Parse the three parts of the input (which are separated by
period characters when using the JWS Compact
Serialization) into the Encoded JWS Header, the Encoded
JWS Payload, and the Encoded JWS Signature.
The Encoded JWS Header MUST be successfully base64url
decoded following the restriction given in this specification that
no padding characters have been used.
The resulting JWS Header MUST be completely valid
JSON syntax conforming to RFC 4627.
The resulting JWS Header MUST be validated to only include
parameters and values whose syntax and semantics are both
understood and supported.
The Encoded JWS Payload MUST be successfully base64url
decoded following the restriction given in this specification that
no padding characters have been used.
The Encoded JWS Signature MUST be successfully base64url
decoded following the restriction given in this specification that
no padding characters have been used.
The JWS Signature MUST be successfully validated
against the JWS Secured Input (the concatenation of the
Encoded JWS Header, a period ('.') character, and the
Encoded JWS Payload)
in the manner defined for the algorithm being used, which
MUST be accurately represented by the value of the alg (algorithm)
header parameter, which MUST be present.
Processing a JWS inevitably requires comparing known strings
to values in the header. For example, in checking what the
algorithm is, the Unicode string encoding alg will be
checked against the member names in the JWS Header
to see if there is a matching header parameter
name. A similar process occurs when determining if the value
of the alg header parameter represents a supported
algorithm.
Comparisons between JSON strings and other Unicode strings
MUST be performed as specified below:
Remove any JSON applied escaping to produce an array of
Unicode code points.
Unicode Normalization MUST NOT
be applied at any point to either the JSON string or to
the string it is to be compared against.
Comparisons between the two strings MUST be performed as a
Unicode code point to code point equality comparison.
JWS uses cryptographic algorithms to digitally sign or MAC
the JWS Header and the JWS Payload.
The JSON Web Algorithms (JWA)
specification describes a set of cryptographic algorithms and
identifiers to be used with this specification.
Specifically, Section 3.1 specifies a set of
alg (algorithm) header parameter values
intended for use this specification.
It also describes the semantics and operations that are
specific to these algorithms and algorithm families.
Public keys employed for digital signing can be identified using the
Header Parameter methods described in or can be distributed
using methods that are outside the scope of this
specification.
The following registration procedure is used for all the
registries established by this specification.
Values are registered with a Specification Required
after a two week review period on the [TBD]@ietf.org mailing
list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the
allocation of values prior to publication, the Designated Expert(s) may approve
registration once they are satisfied that such a specification will be published.
Registration requests must be sent to the [TBD]@ietf.org mailing list for review and
comment, with an appropriate subject (e.g., "Request for access token type: example").
[[ Note to RFC-EDITOR: The name of the mailing list should be determined in consultation
with the IESG and IANA. Suggested name: jose-reg-review. ]]
Within the review period, the Designated Expert(s) will either approve or
deny the registration request, communicating this decision to the review list and IANA.
Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make
the request successful.
IANA must only accept registry updates from the Designated Expert(s), and should direct
all requests for registration to the review mailing list.
This specification establishes the
IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry
for reserved JWS and JWE header parameter names.
The registry records the reserved header parameter name
and a reference to the specification that defines it.
The same Header Parameter Name may be registered multiple times,
provided that the parameter usage is compatible
between the specifications.
The name requested (e.g., "example").
For standards-track RFCs, state "IETF". For others, give the name of the
responsible party. Other details (e.g., postal address, e-mail address, home page
URI) may also be included.
Reference to the document that specifies the parameter, preferably including a URI that
can be used to retrieve a copy of the document. An indication of the relevant
sections may also be included, but is not required.
This specification registers the Header Parameter Names defined in
in this registry.
Header Parameter Name: alg
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: jku
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: jwk
Change Controller: IETF
Specification document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: x5u
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: x5t
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: x5c
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: kid
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: typ
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
Header Parameter Name: cty
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
This specification establishes the
IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry
for values of the JWS and JWE
typ (type)
header parameter.
It is RECOMMENDED that all registered typ values also include a
MIME Media Type
value that the registered value is a short name for.
The registry records the
typ value,
the MIME type value that it is an abbreviation for (if any),
and a reference to the specification that defines it.
MIME Media Type
values MUST NOT be directly registered as new
typ values; rather, new
typ values MAY be registered
as short names for MIME types.
The name requested (e.g., "example").
The MIME type that this name is an abbreviation for (e.g., "application/example").
For standards-track RFCs, state "IETF". For others, give the name of the
responsible party. Other details (e.g., postal address, e-mail address, home page
URI) may also be included.
Reference to the document that specifies the parameter, preferably including a URI that
can be used to retrieve a copy of the document. An indication of the relevant
sections may also be included, but is not required.
This specification registers the JWS
type value in this registry:
"typ" Header Parameter Value: JWS
Abbreviation for MIME type: application/jws
Change Controller: IETF
Specification Document(s): of [[ this document ]]
This specification registers the application/jws Media Type
in the MIME Media Type registry
to indicate that the content is a JWS using the Compact Serialization.
Type name: application
Subtype name: jws
Required parameters: n/a
Optional parameters: n/a
Encoding considerations: JWS values are encoded as a
series of base64url encoded values (some of which may be the
empty string) separated by period ('.') characters
Security considerations: See the Security Considerations section of this document
Interoperability considerations: n/a
Published specification: [[ this document ]]
Applications that use this media type:
OpenID Connect, Mozilla Browser ID, Salesforce, Google, numerous others that use signed JWTs
Additional information:
Magic number(s): n/a,
File extension(s): n/a,
Macintosh file type code(s): n/a
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Michael B. Jones, mbj@microsoft.com
Intended usage: COMMON
Restrictions on usage: none
Author: Michael B. Jones, mbj@microsoft.com
Change Controller: IETF
All of the security issues faced by any cryptographic application
must be faced by a JWS/JWE/JWK agent. Among these issues are protecting
the user's private key, preventing various attacks, and helping the
user avoid mistakes such as inadvertently encrypting a message for
the wrong recipient. The entire list of security considerations is
beyond the scope of this document, but some significant concerns are
listed here.
All the security considerations in
XML DSIG 2.0,
also apply to this specification, other than those that are XML specific.
Likewise, many of the best practices documented in
XML Signature Best Practices
also apply to this specification,
other than those that are XML specific.
Keys are only as strong as the amount of entropy used to
generate them. A minimum of 128 bits of entropy should be
used for all keys, and depending upon the application context,
more may be required.
When utilizing TLS to retrieve information, the authority
providing the resource MUST be authenticated and the
information retrieved MUST be free from modification.
When cryptographic algorithms are implemented in such a way
that successful operations take a different amount of time
than unsuccessful operations, attackers may be able to
use the time difference to obtain information about the keys
employed. Therefore, such timing differences must be avoided.
TBD: Write security considerations about the implications of
using a SHA-1 hash (for compatibility reasons) for the
x5t (x.509 certificate
thumbprint).
TBD: We need a section on generating randomness in browsers;
it's easy to screw up.
TBD: We need to look into
any issues relating to security and JSON parsing. One wonders
just how secure most JSON parsing libraries are. Were they
ever hardened for security scenarios? If not, what kind of
holes does that open up?
We need to put in text about why strict JSON validation is
necessary - basically, that if malformed JSON is received then
the intent of the sender is impossible to reliably discern.
Header parameter names and algorithm names are Unicode strings. For
security reasons, the representations of these names must be
compared verbatim after performing any escape processing (as
per RFC 4627, Section 2.5).
This means, for instance, that these JSON strings must
compare as being equal ("sig", "\u0073ig"), whereas these
must all compare as being not equal to the first set or to
each other ("SIG", "Sig", "si\u0047").
JSON strings MAY contain characters outside the Unicode
Basic Multilingual Plane. For instance, the G clef
character (U+1D11E) may be represented in a JSON string as
"\uD834\uDD1E". Ideally, JWS implementations SHOULD ensure
that characters outside the Basic Multilingual Plane are
preserved and compared correctly; alternatively, if this is
not possible due to these characters exercising limitations
present in the underlying JSON implementation, then input
containing them MUST be rejected.
[[ to be removed by the RFC editor before publication as an RFC ]]
The following items remain to be considered or done in this draft:
Should we define an optional nonce and/or timestamp header parameter?
(Use of a nonce is an effective countermeasure to some kinds of attacks.)
Finish the Security Considerations section.
Unicode Normalization Formsmarkdavis@google.comken@unicode.orgJSON Web Key (JWK)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/JSON Web Algorithms (JWA)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/Coded Character Set -- 7-bit American Standard Code for Information InterchangeAmerican National Standards InstituteJSON Web Token (JWT)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/Ping Identityve7jtb@ve7jtb.comNomura Research Instituten-sakimura@nri.co.jpJSON Web Signature JSON Serialization (JWS-JS)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/independentve7jtb@ve7jtb.comNomura Research Instituten-sakimura@nri.co.jpMagic SignaturesJSON Simple SignindependentNomura Research InstituteCanvas ApplicationsJSON Web Encryption (JWE)Microsoftmbj@microsoft.comhttp://self-issued.info/RTFM, Inc.ekr@rtfm.comCisco Systems, Inc.jhildebr@cisco.com
This section provides several examples of JWSs. While these
examples all represent JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) , the payload can be any base64url encoded
content.
The following example JWS Header declares that the
data structure is a JSON Web Token (JWT)
and the JWS Secured Input is secured using
the HMAC SHA-256 algorithm.
The following byte array contains the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header:
[123, 34, 116, 121, 112, 34, 58, 34, 74, 87, 84, 34, 44, 13, 10, 32, 34, 97, 108, 103, 34, 58, 34, 72, 83, 50, 53, 54, 34, 125]
Base64url encoding these bytes yields this
Encoded JWS Header value:
The JWS Payload used in this example
is the bytes of the UTF-8 representation of the JSON object below.
(Note that the payload can be any base64url
encoded sequence of bytes, and need not be a base64url encoded JSON
object.)
The following byte array, which is the UTF-8 representation
of the JSON object above, is the JWS Payload:
[123, 34, 105, 115, 115, 34, 58, 34, 106, 111, 101, 34, 44, 13, 10, 32, 34, 101, 120, 112, 34, 58, 49, 51, 48, 48, 56, 49, 57, 51, 56, 48, 44, 13, 10, 32, 34, 104, 116, 116, 112, 58, 47, 47, 101, 120, 97, 109, 112, 108, 101, 46, 99, 111, 109, 47, 105, 115, 95, 114, 111, 111, 116, 34, 58, 116, 114, 117, 101, 125]
Base64url encoding the above yields the Encoded JWS Payload value
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
Concatenating the Encoded JWS Header, a period character,
and the Encoded JWS Payload yields this JWS Secured Input
value (with line breaks for display purposes only):
The ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input
is the following byte array:
[101, 121, 74, 48, 101, 88, 65, 105, 79, 105, 74, 75, 86, 49, 81, 105, 76, 65, 48, 75, 73, 67, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 73, 85, 122, 73, 49, 78, 105, 74, 57, 46, 101, 121, 74, 112, 99, 51, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 113, 98, 50, 85, 105, 76, 65, 48, 75, 73, 67, 74, 108, 101, 72, 65, 105, 79, 106, 69, 122, 77, 68, 65, 52, 77, 84, 107, 122, 79, 68, 65, 115, 68, 81, 111, 103, 73, 109, 104, 48, 100, 72, 65, 54, 76, 121, 57, 108, 101, 71, 70, 116, 99, 71, 120, 108, 76, 109, 78, 118, 98, 83, 57, 112, 99, 49, 57, 121, 98, 50, 57, 48, 73, 106, 112, 48, 99, 110, 86, 108, 102, 81]
HMACs are generated using keys. This example uses the key
represented by the following byte array:
[3, 35, 53, 75, 43, 15, 165, 188, 131, 126, 6, 101, 119, 123, 166, 143, 90, 179, 40, 230, 240, 84, 201, 40, 169, 15, 132, 178, 210, 80, 46, 191, 211, 251, 90, 146, 210, 6, 71, 239, 150, 138, 180, 195, 119, 98, 61, 34, 61, 46, 33, 114, 5, 46, 79, 8, 192, 205, 154, 245, 103, 208, 128, 163]
Running the HMAC SHA-256 algorithm on the bytes of the ASCII representation
of the JWS Secured Input
with this key yields the following byte array:
[116, 24, 223, 180, 151, 153, 224, 37, 79, 250, 96, 125, 216, 173, 187, 186, 22, 212, 37, 77, 105, 214, 191, 240, 91, 88, 5, 88, 83, 132, 141, 121]
Base64url encoding the above HMAC output yields the
Encoded JWS Signature value:
Decoding the JWS requires base64url decoding the Encoded JWS Header,
Encoded JWS Payload, and Encoded JWS Signature to produce the
JWS Header, JWS Payload, and JWS Signature byte arrays.
The byte array containing the UTF-8 representation
of the JWS Header is decoded into the JWS Header string.
Next we validate the decoded results. Since the alg
parameter in the header is "HS256", we validate the HMAC SHA-256
value contained in the JWS Signature. If
any of the validation steps fail, the JWS MUST be
rejected.
First, we validate that the JWS Header
string is legal JSON.
To validate the HMAC value, we repeat the previous process
of using the correct key and the ASCII representation of
the JWS Secured Input
as input to the HMAC SHA-256 function
and then taking the output and determining if it matches
the JWS Signature. If it matches exactly,
the HMAC has been validated.
The JWS Header in this example is different
from the previous example in two ways: First, because a
different algorithm is being used, the alg value is
different. Second, for illustration purposes only, the
optional "typ" parameter is not used. (This difference is
not related to the algorithm employed.) The
JWS Header used is:
The following byte array contains the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header:
[123, 34, 97, 108, 103, 34, 58, 34, 82, 83, 50, 53, 54, 34, 125]
Base64url encoding these bytes yields this
Encoded JWS Header value:
The JWS Payload used in this example, which
follows, is the same as in the previous example. Since
the Encoded JWS Payload will therefore be the same, its
computation is not repeated here.
Concatenating the Encoded JWS Header, a period character,
and the Encoded JWS Payload yields this JWS Secured Input
value (with line breaks for display purposes only):
The ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input
is the following byte array:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 83, 85, 122, 73, 49, 78, 105, 74, 57, 46, 101, 121, 74, 112, 99, 51, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 113, 98, 50, 85, 105, 76, 65, 48, 75, 73, 67, 74, 108, 101, 72, 65, 105, 79, 106, 69, 122, 77, 68, 65, 52, 77, 84, 107, 122, 79, 68, 65, 115, 68, 81, 111, 103, 73, 109, 104, 48, 100, 72, 65, 54, 76, 121, 57, 108, 101, 71, 70, 116, 99, 71, 120, 108, 76, 109, 78, 118, 98, 83, 57, 112, 99, 49, 57, 121, 98, 50, 57, 48, 73, 106, 112, 48, 99, 110, 86, 108, 102, 81]
The RSA key consists of a public part (Modulus, Exponent), and a
Private Exponent. The values of the RSA key used in
this example, presented as the byte arrays representing
big endian integers are:
Parameter NameValueModulus
[161, 248, 22, 10, 226, 227, 201, 180, 101, 206, 141, 45, 101, 98, 99, 54, 43, 146, 125, 190, 41, 225, 240, 36, 119, 252, 22, 37, 204, 144, 161, 54, 227, 139, 217, 52, 151, 197, 182, 234, 99, 221, 119, 17, 230, 124, 116, 41, 249, 86, 176, 251, 138, 143, 8, 154, 220, 75, 105, 137, 60, 193, 51, 63, 83, 237, 208, 25, 184, 119, 132, 37, 47, 236, 145, 79, 228, 133, 119, 105, 89, 75, 234, 66, 128, 211, 44, 15, 85, 191, 98, 148, 79, 19, 3, 150, 188, 110, 155, 223, 110, 189, 210, 189, 163, 103, 142, 236, 160, 198, 104, 247, 1, 179, 141, 191, 251, 56, 200, 52, 44, 226, 254, 109, 39, 250, 222, 74, 90, 72, 116, 151, 157, 212, 185, 207, 154, 222, 196, 199, 91, 5, 133, 44, 44, 15, 94, 248, 165, 193, 117, 3, 146, 249, 68, 232, 237, 100, 193, 16, 198, 182, 71, 96, 154, 164, 120, 58, 235, 156, 108, 154, 215, 85, 49, 48, 80, 99, 139, 131, 102, 92, 111, 111, 122, 130, 163, 150, 112, 42, 31, 100, 27, 130, 211, 235, 242, 57, 34, 25, 73, 31, 182, 134, 135, 44, 87, 22, 245, 10, 248, 53, 141, 154, 139, 157, 23, 195, 64, 114, 143, 127, 135, 216, 154, 24, 216, 252, 171, 103, 173, 132, 89, 12, 46, 207, 117, 147, 57, 54, 60, 7, 3, 77, 111, 96, 111, 158, 33, 224, 84, 86, 202, 229, 233, 161]
Exponent
[1, 0, 1]
Private Exponent
[18, 174, 113, 164, 105, 205, 10, 43, 195, 126, 82, 108, 69, 0, 87, 31, 29, 97, 117, 29, 100, 233, 73, 112, 123, 98, 89, 15, 157, 11, 165, 124, 150, 60, 64, 30, 63, 207, 47, 44, 211, 189, 236, 136, 229, 3, 191, 198, 67, 155, 11, 40, 200, 47, 125, 55, 151, 103, 31, 82, 19, 238, 216, 193, 90, 37, 216, 213, 206, 160, 2, 94, 227, 171, 46, 139, 127, 121, 33, 111, 198, 59, 234, 86, 39, 83, 180, 6, 68, 198, 161, 81, 39, 217, 178, 149, 69, 64, 160, 187, 225, 163, 5, 86, 152, 45, 78, 159, 222, 95, 100, 37, 241, 77, 75, 113, 52, 65, 181, 93, 199, 59, 155, 74, 237, 204, 146, 172, 227, 146, 126, 55, 245, 125, 12, 253, 94, 117, 129, 250, 81, 44, 143, 73, 97, 169, 235, 11, 128, 248, 168, 7, 70, 114, 138, 85, 255, 70, 71, 31, 52, 37, 6, 59, 157, 83, 100, 47, 94, 222, 30, 132, 214, 19, 8, 26, 250, 92, 34, 208, 81, 40, 91, 214, 59, 148, 59, 86, 93, 137, 138, 5, 104, 84, 19, 229, 60, 60, 108, 101, 37, 255, 31, 227, 78, 61, 220, 112, 240, 213, 100, 80, 253, 164, 139, 161, 46, 16, 78, 157, 235, 159, 184, 24, 129, 225, 196, 189, 242, 93, 146, 71, 244, 80, 200, 101, 146, 121, 104, 231, 115, 52, 244, 65, 79, 117, 167, 80, 225, 57, 84, 110, 58, 138, 115, 157]
The RSA private key (Modulus, Private Exponent) is then passed to the RSA
signing function, which also takes the hash type, SHA-256,
and the bytes of the ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input
as inputs. The result of the digital signature is a byte array,
which represents a big endian integer. In this example, it
is:
[112, 46, 33, 137, 67, 232, 143, 209, 30, 181, 216, 45, 191, 120, 69, 243, 65, 6, 174, 27, 129, 255, 247, 115, 17, 22, 173, 209, 113, 125, 131, 101, 109, 66, 10, 253, 60, 150, 238, 221, 115, 162, 102, 62, 81, 102, 104, 123, 0, 11, 135, 34, 110, 1, 135, 237, 16, 115, 249, 69, 229, 130, 173, 252, 239, 22, 216, 90, 121, 142, 232, 198, 109, 219, 61, 184, 151, 91, 23, 208, 148, 2, 190, 237, 213, 217, 217, 112, 7, 16, 141, 178, 129, 96, 213, 248, 4, 12, 167, 68, 87, 98, 184, 31, 190, 127, 249, 217, 46, 10, 231, 111, 36, 242, 91, 51, 187, 230, 244, 74, 230, 30, 177, 4, 10, 203, 32, 4, 77, 62, 249, 18, 142, 212, 1, 48, 121, 91, 212, 189, 59, 65, 238, 202, 208, 102, 171, 101, 25, 129, 253, 228, 141, 247, 127, 55, 45, 195, 139, 159, 175, 221, 59, 239, 177, 139, 93, 163, 204, 60, 46, 176, 47, 158, 58, 65, 214, 18, 202, 173, 21, 145, 18, 115, 160, 95, 35, 185, 232, 56, 250, 175, 132, 157, 105, 132, 41, 239, 90, 30, 136, 121, 130, 54, 195, 212, 14, 96, 69, 34, 165, 68, 200, 242, 122, 122, 45, 184, 6, 99, 209, 108, 247, 202, 234, 86, 222, 64, 92, 178, 33, 90, 69, 178, 194, 85, 102, 181, 90, 193, 167, 72, 160, 112, 223, 200, 163, 42, 70, 149, 67, 208, 25, 238, 251, 71]
Base64url encoding the digital signature produces this value for
the Encoded JWS Signature
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
Decoding the JWS requires base64url decoding the Encoded JWS Header,
Encoded JWS Payload, and Encoded JWS Signature to produce the
JWS Header, JWS Payload, and JWS Signature byte arrays.
The byte array containing the UTF-8 representation
of the JWS Header is decoded into the JWS Header string.
Since the alg parameter in the header is "RS256", we
validate the RSA SHA-256 digital signature contained in the JWS Signature. If any of the validation steps fail, the
JWS MUST be rejected.
First, we validate that the JWS Header
string is legal JSON.
Validating the JWS Signature is a little different
from the previous example. First, we base64url decode the
Encoded JWS Signature to produce a digital signature S to check. We
then pass (n, e), S and the bytes of the ASCII representation of the
JWS Secured Input
to an RSA signature verifier that has
been configured to use the SHA-256 hash function.
The JWS Header for this example differs from
the previous example because a different algorithm is
being used. The JWS Header used is:
The following byte array contains the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header:
[123, 34, 97, 108, 103, 34, 58, 34, 69, 83, 50, 53, 54, 34, 125]
Base64url encoding these bytes yields this
Encoded JWS Header value:
The JWS Payload used in this example, which
follows, is the same as in the previous examples. Since
the Encoded JWS Payload will therefore be the same, its
computation is not repeated here.
Concatenating the Encoded JWS Header, a period character,
and the Encoded JWS Payload yields this JWS Secured Input
value (with line breaks for display purposes only):
The ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input
is the following byte array:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 70, 85, 122, 73, 49, 78, 105, 74, 57, 46, 101, 121, 74, 112, 99, 51, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 113, 98, 50, 85, 105, 76, 65, 48, 75, 73, 67, 74, 108, 101, 72, 65, 105, 79, 106, 69, 122, 77, 68, 65, 52, 77, 84, 107, 122, 79, 68, 65, 115, 68, 81, 111, 103, 73, 109, 104, 48, 100, 72, 65, 54, 76, 121, 57, 108, 101, 71, 70, 116, 99, 71, 120, 108, 76, 109, 78, 118, 98, 83, 57, 112, 99, 49, 57, 121, 98, 50, 57, 48, 73, 106, 112, 48, 99, 110, 86, 108, 102, 81]
The ECDSA key consists of a public part, the EC point (x,
y), and a private part d. The values of the ECDSA key
used in this example, presented as the byte arrays
representing three 256 bit big endian integers are:
Parameter NameValuex
[127, 205, 206, 39, 112, 246, 196, 93, 65, 131, 203, 238, 111, 219, 75, 123, 88, 7, 51, 53, 123, 233, 239, 19, 186, 207, 110, 60, 123, 209, 84, 69]
y
[199, 241, 68, 205, 27, 189, 155, 126, 135, 44, 223, 237, 185, 238, 185, 244, 179, 105, 93, 110, 169, 11, 36, 173, 138, 70, 35, 40, 133, 136, 229, 173]
d
[142, 155, 16, 158, 113, 144, 152, 191, 152, 4, 135, 223, 31, 93, 119, 233, 203, 41, 96, 110, 190, 210, 38, 59, 95, 87, 194, 19, 223, 132, 244, 178]
The ECDSA private part d is then passed to an ECDSA
signing function, which also takes the curve type, P-256,
the hash type, SHA-256, and the bytes of the ASCII representation of
the JWS Secured Input
as inputs. The result of the
digital signature is the EC point (R, S), where R and S are
unsigned integers. In this example, the R and S values,
given as byte arrays representing big endian integers are:
Result NameValueR
[14, 209, 33, 83, 121, 99, 108, 72, 60, 47, 127, 21, 88, 7, 212, 2, 163, 178, 40, 3, 58, 249, 124, 126, 23, 129, 154, 195, 22, 158, 166, 101]
S
[197, 10, 7, 211, 140, 60, 112, 229, 216, 241, 45, 175, 8, 74, 84, 128, 166, 101, 144, 197, 242, 147, 80, 154, 143, 63, 127, 138, 131, 163, 84, 213]
Concatenating the S array to the end of the R array and
base64url encoding the result produces this value for the
Encoded JWS Signature
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
Decoding the JWS requires base64url decoding the Encoded JWS Header,
Encoded JWS Payload, and Encoded JWS Signature to produce the
JWS Header, JWS Payload, and JWS Signature byte arrays.
The byte array containing the UTF-8 representation
of the JWS Header is decoded into the JWS Header string.
Since the alg parameter in the header is "ES256", we
validate the ECDSA P-256 SHA-256 digital signature contained in
the JWS Signature. If any of the validation steps
fail, the JWS MUST be rejected.
First, we validate that the JWS Header
string is legal JSON.
Validating the JWS Signature is a little different
from the first example. First, we base64url decode the Encoded JWS Signature as in the previous examples but we then
need to split the 64 member byte array that must result
into two 32 byte arrays, the first R and the second S. We
then pass (x, y), (R, S) and the bytes of the ASCII representation of
the JWS Secured Input
to an ECDSA signature verifier that
has been configured to use the P-256 curve with the
SHA-256 hash function.
As explained in Section 3.4 of the
JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification, the
use of the K value in ECDSA means that we cannot validate
the correctness of the digital signature in the same way we
validated the correctness of the HMAC. Instead,
implementations MUST use an ECDSA validator to validate
the digital signature.
The JWS Header for this example differs from
the previous example because a different ECDSA curve
and hash function are used. The JWS Header used is:
The following byte array contains the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header:
[123, 34, 97, 108, 103, 34, 58, 34, 69, 83, 53, 49, 50, 34, 125]
Base64url encoding these bytes yields this
Encoded JWS Header value:
The JWS Payload used in this example, is the ASCII string "Payload".
The representation of this string is the byte array:
[80, 97, 121, 108, 111, 97, 100]
Base64url encoding these bytes yields the Encoded JWS Payload value:
Concatenating the Encoded JWS Header, a period character,
and the Encoded JWS Payload yields this JWS Secured Input
value:
The ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input
is the following byte array:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 70, 85, 122, 85, 120, 77, 105, 74, 57, 46, 85, 71, 70, 53, 98, 71, 57, 104, 90, 65]
The ECDSA key consists of a public part, the EC point (x,
y), and a private part d. The values of the ECDSA key
used in this example, presented as the byte arrays
representing three 521 bit big endian integers are:
Parameter NameValuex
[1, 233, 41, 5, 15, 18, 79, 198,
188, 85, 199, 213, 57, 51, 101, 223, 157, 239, 74, 176, 194, 44, 178, 87,
152, 249, 52, 235, 4, 227, 198, 186, 227, 112, 26, 87, 167, 145, 14, 157,
129, 191, 54, 49, 89, 232, 235, 203, 21, 93, 99, 73, 244, 189, 182, 204,
248, 169, 76, 92, 89, 199, 170, 193, 1, 164]
y
[0, 52, 166, 68, 14, 55,
103, 80, 210, 55, 31, 209, 189, 194, 200, 243, 183, 29, 47, 78, 229, 234,
52, 50, 200, 21, 204, 163, 21, 96, 254, 93, 147, 135, 236, 119, 75, 85,
131, 134, 48, 229, 203, 191, 90, 140, 190, 10, 145, 221, 0, 100, 198, 153,
154, 31, 110, 110, 103, 250, 221, 237, 228, 200, 200, 246]
d
[1, 142, 105, 111,
176, 52, 80, 88, 129, 221, 17, 11, 72, 62, 184, 125, 50, 206, 73, 95,
227, 107, 55, 69, 237, 242, 216, 202, 228, 240, 242, 83, 159, 70, 21, 160,
233, 142, 171, 82, 179, 192, 197, 234, 196, 206, 7, 81, 133, 168, 231, 187,
71, 222, 172, 29, 29, 231, 123, 204, 246, 97, 53, 230, 61, 130]
The ECDSA private part d is then passed to an ECDSA
signing function, which also takes the curve type, P-521,
the hash type, SHA-512, and the bytes of the ASCII representation of
the JWS Secured Input
as inputs. The result of the
digital signature is the EC point (R, S), where R and S are
unsigned integers. In this example, the R and S values,
given as byte arrays representing big endian integers are:
Result NameValueR
[1, 220, 12, 129, 231, 171, 194, 209, 232, 135, 233, 117, 247, 105, 122, 210,
26, 125, 192, 1, 217, 21, 82, 91, 45, 240, 255, 83, 19, 34, 239, 71,
48, 157, 147, 152, 105, 18, 53, 108, 163, 214, 68, 231, 62, 153, 150, 106,
194, 164, 246, 72, 143, 138, 24, 50, 129, 223, 133, 206, 209, 172, 63, 237,
119, 109]
S
[0, 111, 6, 105, 44, 5, 41, 208, 128, 61, 152, 40, 92, 61,
152, 4, 150, 66, 60, 69, 247, 196, 170, 81, 193, 199, 78, 59, 194, 169,
16, 124, 9, 143, 42, 142, 131, 48, 206, 238, 34, 175, 83, 203, 220, 159,
3, 107, 155, 22, 27, 73, 111, 68, 68, 21, 238, 144, 229, 232, 148, 188,
222, 59, 242, 103]
Concatenating the S array to the end of the R array and
base64url encoding the result produces this value for the
Encoded JWS Signature
(with line breaks for display purposes only):
Decoding the JWS requires base64url decoding the Encoded JWS Header,
Encoded JWS Payload, and Encoded JWS Signature to produce the
JWS Header, JWS Payload, and JWS Signature byte arrays.
The byte array containing the UTF-8 representation
of the JWS Header is decoded into the JWS Header string.
Since the alg parameter in the header is "ES512", we
validate the ECDSA P-521 SHA-512 digital signature contained in
the JWS Signature. If any of the validation steps
fail, the JWS MUST be rejected.
First, we validate that the JWS Header
string is legal JSON.
Validating the JWS Signature is similar to the previous example.
First, we base64url decode the Encoded JWS Signature as in the previous examples but we then
need to split the 132 member byte array that must result
into two 66 byte arrays, the first R and the second S. We
then pass (x, y), (R, S) and the bytes of the ASCII representation of
the JWS Secured Input
to an ECDSA signature verifier that
has been configured to use the P-521 curve with the
SHA-512 hash function.
As explained in Section 3.4 of the
JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification, the
use of the K value in ECDSA means that we cannot validate
the correctness of the digital signature in the same way we
validated the correctness of the HMAC. Instead,
implementations MUST use an ECDSA validator to validate
the digital signature.
The following example JWS Header declares that the
encoded object is a Plaintext JWS:
Base64url encoding the bytes of the UTF-8 representation of
the JWS Header yields this Encoded JWS Header:
The JWS Payload used in this example, which
follows, is the same as in the previous examples. Since
the Encoded JWS Payload will therefore be the same, its
computation is not repeated here.
The Encoded JWS Signature is the empty string.
Concatenating these parts in the order
Header.Payload.Signature with period characters between the
parts yields this complete JWS (with line breaks for
display purposes only):
The string below is an example of a certificate chain
that could be used as the value of an
x5c (X.509 Certificate Chain) header parameter,
per .
This appendix describes how to implement base64url encoding
and decoding functions without padding based upon standard
base64 encoding and decoding functions that do use padding.
To be concrete, example C# code implementing these functions
is shown below. Similar code could be used in other
languages.
As per the example code above, the number of '=' padding
characters that needs to be added to the end of a base64url
encoded string without padding to turn it into one with
padding is a deterministic function of the length of the
encoded string. Specifically,
if the length mod 4 is 0, no padding is added;
if the length mod 4 is 2, two '=' padding characters are added;
if the length mod 4 is 3, one '=' padding character is added;
if the length mod 4 is 1, the input is malformed.
An example correspondence between unencoded and encoded values
follows. The byte sequence below encodes into the string
below, which when decoded, reproduces the byte sequence.
Solutions for signing JSON content were previously explored by
Magic Signatures, JSON Simple Sign, and Canvas Applications, all of which
influenced this draft.
Dirk Balfanz, Yaron Y. Goland, John Panzer, and Paul Tarjan
all made significant contributions to the design of this
specification.
My thanks to Axel Nennker for his early implementation
and feedback on the JWS and JWE specifications.
[[ to be removed by the RFC editor before publication as an RFC ]]
-03
Added the cty (content type) header parameter
for declaring type information about the secured content,
as opposed to the typ (type) header parameter,
which declares type information about this object.
Added "Collision Resistant Namespace" to the terminology section.
Reference ITU.X690.1994 for DER encoding.
Added an example JWS using ECDSA P-521 SHA-512. This has particular
illustrative value because of the use of the 521 bit integers
in the key and signature values.
This is also an example in which the payload is not a base64url
encoded JSON object.
Added an example x5c value.
No longer say "the UTF-8 representation of the JWS Secured Input
(which is the same as the ASCII representation)". Just call it
"the ASCII representation of the JWS Secured Input".
Added Registration Template sections for defined registries.
Added Registry Contents sections to populate registry values.
Changed name of the JSON Web Signature and Encryption "typ" Values registry
to be the JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry, since
it is used for more than just values of the
typ parameter.
Moved registries
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters and
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values
to the JWS specification.
Numerous editorial improvements.
-02
Clarified that it is an error when a kid
value is included and no matching key is found.
Removed assumption that kid (key ID)
can only refer to an asymmetric key.
Clarified that JWSs with duplicate Header Parameter Names
MUST be rejected.
Clarified the relationship between
typ header parameter values
and MIME types.
Registered application/jws MIME type and "JWS" typ header parameter value.
Simplified JWK terminology to get replace the "JWK Key Object" and
"JWK Container Object" terms with simply "JSON Web Key (JWK)"
and "JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set)" and to eliminate potential
confusion between single keys and sets of keys.
As part of this change, the header parameter name for a
public key value was changed from
jpk (JSON Public Key) to
jwk (JSON Web Key).
Added suggestion on defining additional header parameters
such as x5t#S256 in the future
for certificate thumbprints using hash algorithms other
than SHA-1.
Specify RFC 2818 server identity validation, rather than
RFC 6125 (paralleling the same decision in the OAuth specs).
Generalized language to refer to Message Authentication Codes (MACs)
rather than Hash-based Message Authentication Codes (HMACs)
unless in a context specific to HMAC algorithms.
Reformatted to give each header parameter its own section heading.
-01
Moved definition of Plaintext JWSs (using "alg":"none")
here from the JWT specification since this functionality is
likely to be useful in more contexts that just for JWTs.
Added jpk and x5c header parameters for including
JWK public keys and X.509 certificate chains directly in
the header.
Clarified that this specification is defining the JWS
Compact Serialization. Referenced the new JWS-JS spec,
which defines the JWS JSON Serialization.
Added text "New header parameters should be introduced
sparingly since an implementation that does not understand
a parameter MUST reject the JWS".
Clarified that the order of the creation and validation
steps is not significant in cases where there are no
dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps.
Changed "no canonicalization is performed" to "no
canonicalization need be performed".
Corrected the Magic Signatures reference.
Made other editorial improvements suggested by JOSE
working group participants.
-00
Created the initial IETF draft based upon
draft-jones-json-web-signature-04 with no normative
changes.
Changed terminology to no longer call both digital
signatures and HMACs "signatures".