TOC |
|
JSON Web Encryption (JWE) is a means of representing encrypted content using JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) based data structures. Cryptographic algorithms and identifiers for use with this specification are described in the separate JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) specification. Related digital signature and MAC capabilities are described in the separate JSON Web Signature (JWS) specification.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 29, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
1.
Introduction
1.1.
Notational Conventions
2.
Terminology
3.
JSON Web Encryption (JWE) Overview
3.1.
Example JWE
4.
JWE Header
4.1.
Reserved Header Parameter Names
4.1.1.
"alg" (Algorithm) Header Parameter
4.1.2.
"enc" (Encryption Method) Header Parameter
4.1.3.
"epk" (Ephemeral Public Key) Header Parameter
4.1.4.
"zip" (Compression Algorithm) Header Parameter
4.1.5.
"jku" (JWK Set URL) Header Parameter
4.1.6.
"jwk" (JSON Web Key) Header Parameter
4.1.7.
"x5u" (X.509 URL) Header Parameter
4.1.8.
"x5t" (X.509 Certificate Thumbprint) Header Parameter
4.1.9.
"x5c" (X.509 Certificate Chain) Header Parameter
4.1.10.
"kid" (Key ID) Header Parameter
4.1.11.
"typ" (Type) Header Parameter
4.1.12.
"cty" (Content Type) Header Parameter
4.1.13.
"apu" (Agreement PartyUInfo) Header Parameter
4.1.14.
"crit" (Critical) Header Parameter
4.2.
Public Header Parameter Names
4.3.
Private Header Parameter Names
5.
Producing and Consuming JWEs
5.1.
Message Encryption
5.2.
Message Decryption
5.3.
String Comparison Rules
6.
Cryptographic Algorithms
6.1.
CEK Encryption
7.
Key Identification
8.
JWE JSON Serialization
9.
Implementation Considerations
10.
IANA Considerations
10.1.
Registration of JWE Header Parameter Names
10.1.1.
Registry Contents
10.2.
JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values Registration
10.2.1.
Registry Contents
10.3.
Media Type Registration
10.3.1.
Registry Contents
11.
Security Considerations
12.
References
12.1.
Normative References
12.2.
Informative References
Appendix A.
JWE Examples
A.1.
Example JWE using RSAES OAEP and AES GCM
A.1.1.
JWE Header
A.1.2.
Encoded JWE Header
A.1.3.
Content Encryption Key (CEK)
A.1.4.
Key Encryption
A.1.5.
Encoded JWE Encrypted Key
A.1.6.
Initialization Vector
A.1.7.
Additional Authenticated Data
A.1.8.
Plaintext Encryption
A.1.9.
Encoded JWE Ciphertext
A.1.10.
Encoded JWE Authentication Tag
A.1.11.
Complete Representation
A.1.12.
Validation
A.2.
Example JWE using RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 and AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256
A.2.1.
JWE Header
A.2.2.
Encoded JWE Header
A.2.3.
Content Encryption Key (CEK)
A.2.4.
Key Encryption
A.2.5.
Encoded JWE Encrypted Key
A.2.6.
Initialization Vector
A.2.7.
Additional Authenticated Data
A.2.8.
Plaintext Encryption
A.2.9.
Encoded JWE Ciphertext
A.2.10.
Encoded JWE Authentication Tag
A.2.11.
Complete Representation
A.2.12.
Validation
A.3.
Example JWE using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM
A.3.1.
JWE Header
A.3.2.
Encoded JWE Header
A.3.3.
Content Encryption Key (CEK)
A.3.4.
Key Encryption
A.3.5.
Encoded JWE Encrypted Key
A.3.6.
Initialization Vector
A.3.7.
Additional Authenticated Data
A.3.8.
Plaintext Encryption
A.3.9.
Encoded JWE Ciphertext
A.3.10.
Encoded JWE Authentication Tag
A.3.11.
Complete Representation
A.3.12.
Validation
A.4.
Example JWE Using JWE JSON Serialization
A.4.1.
JWE Per-Recipient Unprotected Headers
A.4.2.
JWE Protected Header
A.4.3.
JWE Unprotected Header
A.4.4.
Complete JWE Header Values
A.4.5.
Additional Authenticated Data
A.4.6.
Plaintext Encryption
A.4.7.
Encoded JWE Ciphertext
A.4.8.
Encoded JWE Authentication Tag
A.4.9.
Complete JWE JSON Serialization Representation
Appendix B.
Example AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 Computation
B.1.
Extract MAC_KEY and ENC_KEY from Key
B.2.
Encrypt Plaintext to Create Ciphertext
B.3.
64 Bit Big Endian Representation of AAD Length
B.4.
Initialization Vector Value
B.5.
Create Input to HMAC Computation
B.6.
Compute HMAC Value
B.7.
Truncate HMAC Value to Create Authentication Tag
Appendix C.
Acknowledgements
Appendix D.
Document History
§
Authors' Addresses
TOC |
JSON Web Encryption (JWE) is a means of representing encrypted content using JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) [RFC4627] (Crockford, D., “The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON),” July 2006.) based data structures. The JWE cryptographic mechanisms encrypt and provide integrity protection for arbitrary sequences of octets.
Two closely related representations for JWE objects are defined. The JWE Compact Serialization is a compact, URL-safe representation intended for space constrained environments such as HTTP Authorization headers and URI query parameters. The JWE JSON Serialization represents JWE objects as JSON objects and enables the same content to be encrypted to multiple parties. Both share the same cryptographic underpinnings.
Cryptographic algorithms and identifiers for use with this specification are described in the separate JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) specification. Related digital signature and MAC capabilities are described in the separate JSON Web Signature (JWS) [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.) specification.
TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
- JSON Web Encryption (JWE)
- A data structure representing an encrypted message. The structure represents five values: the JWE Header, the JWE Encrypted Key, the JWE Initialization Vector, the JWE Ciphertext, and the JWE Authentication Tag.
- Authenticated Encryption
- An Authenticated Encryption algorithm is one that provides an integrated content integrity check. Authenticated Encryption algorithms accept two inputs, the Plaintext and the Additional Authenticated Data value, and produce two outputs, the Ciphertext and the Authentication Tag value. AES Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) is one such algorithm.
- Plaintext
- The sequence of octets to be encrypted -- a.k.a., the message. The plaintext can contain an arbitrary sequence of octets.
- Ciphertext
- An encrypted representation of the Plaintext.
- Additional Authenticated Data (AAD)
- An input to an Authenticated Encryption operation that is integrity protected but not encrypted.
- Authentication Tag
- An output of an Authenticated Encryption operation that ensures the integrity of the Ciphertext and the Additional Authenticated Data. Note that some algorithms may not use an Authentication Tag, in which case this value is the empty octet sequence.
- Content Encryption Key (CEK)
- A symmetric key for the Authenticated Encryption algorithm used to encrypt the Plaintext for the recipient to produce the Ciphertext and the Authentication Tag.
- JSON Text Object
- A UTF-8 [RFC3629] (Yergeau, F., “UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646,” November 2003.) encoded text string representing a JSON object; the syntax of JSON objects is defined in Section 2.2 of [RFC4627] (Crockford, D., “The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON),” July 2006.).
- JWE Header
- A JSON Text Object (or JSON Text Objects, when using the JWE JSON Serialization) that describes the encryption operations applied to create the JWE Encrypted Key, the JWE Ciphertext, and the JWE Authentication Tag. The members of the JWE Header object(s) are Header Parameters.
- JWE Encrypted Key
- The result of encrypting the Content Encryption Key (CEK) with the intended recipient's key using the specified algorithm. Note that for some algorithms, the JWE Encrypted Key value is specified as being the empty octet sequence.
- JWE Initialization Vector
- A sequence of octets containing the Initialization Vector used when encrypting the Plaintext. Note that some algorithms may not use an Initialization Vector, in which case this value is the empty octet sequence.
- JWE Ciphertext
- A sequence of octets containing the Ciphertext for a JWE.
- JWE Authentication Tag
- A sequence of octets containing the Authentication Tag for a JWE.
- JWE Protected Header
- A JSON Text Object that contains the portion of the JWE Header that is integrity protected. For the JWE Compact Serialization, this comprises the entire JWE Header. For the JWE JSON Serialization, this is one component of the JWE Header.
- Header Parameter
- A name/value pair that is member of the JWE Header.
- Header Parameter Name
- The name of a member of the JWE Header.
- Header Parameter Value
- The value of a member of the JWE Header.
- Base64url Encoding
- The URL- and filename-safe Base64 encoding described in RFC 4648 (Josefsson, S., “The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings,” October 2006.) [RFC4648], Section 5, with the (non URL-safe) '=' padding characters omitted, as permitted by Section 3.2. (See Appendix C of [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.) for notes on implementing base64url encoding without padding.)
- Encoded JWE Header
- Base64url encoding of the JWE Protected Header.
- Encoded JWE Encrypted Key
- Base64url encoding of the JWE Encrypted Key.
- Encoded JWE Initialization Vector
- Base64url encoding of the JWE Initialization Vector.
- Encoded JWE Ciphertext
- Base64url encoding of the JWE Ciphertext.
- Encoded JWE Authentication Tag
- Base64url encoding of the JWE Authentication Tag.
- JWE Compact Serialization
- A representation of the JWE as the concatenation of the Encoded JWE Header, the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, the Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag in that order, with the five strings being separated by four period ('.') characters. This representation is compact and URL-safe.
- JWE JSON Serialization
- A representation of the JWE as a JSON structure containing JWE Header, Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and Encoded JWE Authentication Tag values. Unlike the JWE Compact Serialization, the JWE JSON Serialization enables the same content to be encrypted to multiple parties. This representation is neither compact nor URL-safe.
- Collision Resistant Namespace
- A namespace that allows names to be allocated in a manner such that they are highly unlikely to collide with other names. For instance, collision resistance can be achieved through administrative delegation of portions of the namespace or through use of collision-resistant name allocation functions. Examples of Collision Resistant Namespaces include: Domain Names, Object Identifiers (OIDs) as defined in the ITU-T X.660 and X.670 Recommendation series, and Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs) [RFC4122] (Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace,” July 2005.). When using an administratively delegated namespace, the definer of a name needs to take reasonable precautions to ensure they are in control of the portion of the namespace they use to define the name.
- StringOrURI
- A JSON string value, with the additional requirement that while arbitrary string values MAY be used, any value containing a ":" character MUST be a URI [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.). StringOrURI values are compared as case-sensitive strings with no transformations or canonicalizations applied.
- Key Management Mode
- A method of determining the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value to use. Each algorithm used for determining the CEK value uses a specific Key Management Mode. Key Management Modes employed by this specification are Key Encryption, Key Wrapping, Direct Key Agreement, Key Agreement with Key Wrapping, and Direct Encryption.
- Key Encryption
- A Key Management Mode in which the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value is encrypted to the intended recipient using an asymmetric encryption algorithm.
- Key Wrapping
- A Key Management Mode in which the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value is encrypted to the intended recipient using a symmetric key wrapping algorithm.
- Direct Key Agreement
- A Key Management Mode in which a key agreement algorithm is used to agree upon the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value.
- Key Agreement with Key Wrapping
- A Key Management Mode in which a key agreement algorithm is used to agree upon a symmetric key used to encrypt the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value to the intended recipient using a symmetric key wrapping algorithm.
- Direct Encryption
- A Key Management Mode in which the Content Encryption Key (CEK) value used is the secret symmetric key value shared between the parties.
TOC |
JWE represents encrypted content using JSON data structures and base64url encoding. Five values are represented in a JWE: the JWE Header, the JWE Encrypted Key, the JWE Initialization Vector, the JWE Ciphertext, and the JWE Authentication Tag. In the Compact Serialization, the five values are base64url-encoded for transmission, and represented as the concatenation of the encoded strings in that order, with the five strings being separated by four period ('.') characters. A JSON Serialization for this information is also defined in Section 8 (JWE JSON Serialization).
JWE utilizes authenticated encryption to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the Plaintext and the integrity of the JWE Protected Header.
TOC |
This example encrypts the plaintext "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination." to the recipient using RSAES OAEP and AES GCM.
The following example JWE Header declares that:
{"alg":"RSA-OAEP","enc":"A256GCM"}
Base64url encoding the octets of the UTF-8 representation of the JWE Header yields this Encoded JWE Header value:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZHQ00ifQ
The remaining steps to finish creating this JWE are:
The final result in this example (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZHQ00ifQ. OKOawDo13gRp2ojaHV7LFpZcgV7T6DVZKTyKOMTYUmKoTCVJRgckCL9kiMT03JGe ipsEdY3mx_etLbbWSrFr05kLzcSr4qKAq7YN7e9jwQRb23nfa6c9d-StnImGyFDb Sv04uVuxIp5Zms1gNxKKK2Da14B8S4rzVRltdYwam_lDp5XnZAYpQdb76FdIKLaV mqgfwX7XWRxv2322i-vDxRfqNzo_tETKzpVLzfiwQyeyPGLBIO56YJ7eObdv0je8 1860ppamavo35UgoRdbYaBcoh9QcfylQr66oc6vFWXRcZ_ZT2LawVCWTIy3brGPi 6UklfCpIMfIjf7iGdXKHzg. 48V1_ALb6US04U3b. 5eym8TW_c8SuK0ltJ3rpYIzOeDQz7TALvtu6UG9oMo4vpzs9tX_EFShS8iB7j6ji SdiwkIr3ajwQzaBtQD_A. XFBoMYUZodetZdvTiFvSkQ
See Appendix A.1 (Example JWE using RSAES OAEP and AES GCM) for the complete details of computing this JWE. See Appendix A (JWE Examples) for additional examples.
TOC |
The members of the JSON object(s) represented by the JWE Header describe the encryption applied to the Plaintext and optionally additional properties of the JWE. The Header Parameter Names within the JWE Header MUST be unique; JWEs with duplicate Header Parameter Names MUST be rejected.
Implementations are required to understand the specific header parameters defined by this specification that are designated as "MUST be understood" and process them in the manner defined in this specification. All other header parameters defined by this specification that are not so designated MUST be ignored when not understood. Unless listed as a critical header parameter, per Section 4.1.14 ("crit" (Critical) Header Parameter), all other header parameters MUST be ignored when not understood.
There are two ways of distinguishing whether a header is a JWS Header or a JWE Header. The first is by examining the alg (algorithm) header parameter value. If the value represents a digital signature or MAC algorithm, or is the value none, it is for a JWS; if it represents a Key Encryption, Key Wrapping, Direct Key Agreement, Key Agreement with Key Wrapping, or Direct Encryption algorithm, it is for a JWE. A second method is determining whether an enc (encryption method) member exists. If the enc member exists, it is a JWE; otherwise, it is a JWS. Both methods will yield the same result for all legal input values.
There are three classes of Header Parameter Names: Reserved Header Parameter Names, Public Header Parameter Names, and Private Header Parameter Names.
TOC |
The following Header Parameter Names are reserved with meanings as defined below. All the names are short because a core goal of this specification is for the resulting representations using the JWE Compact Serialization to be compact.
Additional reserved Header Parameter Names can be defined via the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.). As indicated by the common registry, JWSs and JWEs share a common header parameter space; when a parameter is used by both specifications, its usage must be compatible between the specifications.
TOC |
The alg (algorithm) header parameter identifies the cryptographic algorithm used to encrypt or determine the value of the Content Encryption Key (CEK). The algorithm specified by the alg value MUST be supported by the implementation and there MUST be a key for use with that algorithm associated with the intended recipient or the JWE MUST be rejected. alg values SHOULD either be registered in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) or be a value that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace. The alg value is a case sensitive string containing a StringOrURI value. Use of this header parameter is REQUIRED. This header parameter MUST be understood by implementations.
A list of defined alg values can be found in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.); the initial contents of this registry are the values defined in Section 4.1 of the JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) specification.
TOC |
The enc (encryption method) header parameter identifies the block encryption algorithm used to encrypt the Plaintext to produce the Ciphertext. This algorithm MUST be an Authenticated Encryption algorithm with a specified key length. The algorithm specified by the enc value MUST be supported by the implementation or the JWE MUST be rejected. enc values SHOULD either be registered in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) or be a value that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace. The enc value is a case sensitive string containing a StringOrURI value. Use of this header parameter is REQUIRED. This header parameter MUST be understood by implementations.
A list of defined enc values can be found in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.); the initial contents of this registry are the values defined in Section 4.2 of the JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) specification.
TOC |
The epk (ephemeral public key) value created by the originator for the use in key agreement algorithms. This key is represented as a JSON Web Key [JWK] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Key (JWK),” May 2013.) value. When the alg value used identifies an algorithm for which epk is a parameter, this parameter MUST be present if REQUIRED by the algorithm and this header parameter MUST be understood by implementations; otherwise, this parameter MUST be omitted.
TOC |
The zip (compression algorithm) applied to the Plaintext before encryption, if any. If present, the value of the zip header parameter MUST be the case sensitive string "DEF". Compression is performed with the DEFLATE [RFC1951] (Deutsch, P., “DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3,” May 1996.) algorithm. If no zip parameter is present, no compression is applied to the Plaintext before encryption. This header parameter MUST be integrity protected, and therefore MUST occur only with the JWE Protected Header, when used. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL. This header parameter MUST be understood by implementations.
TOC |
The jku (JWK Set URL) header parameter is a URI [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.) that refers to a resource for a set of JSON-encoded public keys, one of which is the key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. The keys MUST be encoded as a JSON Web Key Set (JWK Set) [JWK] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Key (JWK),” May 2013.). The protocol used to acquire the resource MUST provide integrity protection; an HTTP GET request to retrieve the certificate MUST use TLS [RFC2818] (Rescorla, E., “HTTP Over TLS,” May 2000.) [RFC5246] (Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2,” August 2008.); the identity of the server MUST be validated, as per Section 3.1 of HTTP Over TLS [RFC2818] (Rescorla, E., “HTTP Over TLS,” May 2000.). Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
TOC |
The jwk (JSON Web Key) header parameter is the public key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. This key is represented as a JSON Web Key [JWK] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Key (JWK),” May 2013.). Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
TOC |
The x5u (X.509 URL) header parameter is a URI [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.) that refers to a resource for the X.509 public key certificate or certificate chain [RFC5280] (Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” May 2008.) containing the key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. The identified resource MUST provide a representation of the certificate or certificate chain that conforms to RFC 5280 (Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” May 2008.) [RFC5280] in PEM encoded form [RFC1421] (Linn, J., “Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part I: Message Encryption and Authentication Procedures,” February 1993.). The certificate containing the public key to which the JWE was encrypted MUST be the first certificate. This MAY be followed by additional certificates, with each subsequent certificate being the one used to certify the previous one. The protocol used to acquire the resource MUST provide integrity protection; an HTTP GET request to retrieve the certificate MUST use TLS [RFC2818] (Rescorla, E., “HTTP Over TLS,” May 2000.) [RFC5246] (Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2,” August 2008.); the identity of the server MUST be validated, as per Section 3.1 of HTTP Over TLS [RFC2818] (Rescorla, E., “HTTP Over TLS,” May 2000.). Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
TOC |
The x5t (X.509 Certificate Thumbprint) header parameter is a base64url encoded SHA-1 thumbprint (a.k.a. digest) of the DER encoding of the X.509 certificate [RFC5280] (Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” May 2008.) containing the key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
If, in the future, certificate thumbprints need to be computed using hash functions other than SHA-1, it is suggested that additional related header parameters be defined for that purpose. For example, it is suggested that a new x5t#S256 (X.509 Certificate Thumbprint using SHA-256) header parameter could be defined by registering it in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.).
TOC |
The x5c (X.509 Certificate Chain) header parameter contains the X.509 public key certificate or certificate chain [RFC5280] (Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” May 2008.) containing the key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. The certificate or certificate chain is represented as a JSON array of certificate value strings. Each string in the array is a base64 encoded ([RFC4648] (Josefsson, S., “The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings,” October 2006.) Section 4 -- not base64url encoded) DER [ITU.X690.1994] (International Telecommunications Union, “Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER),” 1994.) PKIX certificate value. The certificate containing the public key to which the JWE was encrypted MUST be the first certificate. This MAY be followed by additional certificates, with each subsequent certificate being the one used to certify the previous one. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
See Appendix B of [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.) for an example x5c value.
TOC |
The kid (key ID) header parameter is a hint indicating which key to which the JWE was encrypted; this can be used to determine the private key needed to decrypt the JWE. This parameter allows originators to explicitly signal a change of key to recipients. Should the recipient be unable to locate a key corresponding to the kid value, they SHOULD treat that condition as an error. The interpretation of the kid value is unspecified. Its value MUST be a string. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
When used with a JWK, the kid value can be used to match a JWK kid parameter value.
TOC |
The typ (type) header parameter is used to declare the type of this object. The type value JWE is used to indicate that this object is a JWE using the JWE Compact Serialization. The type value JWE+JSON is used to indicate that this object is a JWE using the JWE JSON Serialization. Other type values MAY be used, and if not understood, SHOULD be ignored. The typ value is a case sensitive string. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
MIME Media Type [RFC2046] (Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” November 1996.) values MAY be used as typ values.
typ values SHOULD either be registered in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.) or be a value that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace.
TOC |
The cty (content type) header parameter is used to declare the type of the encrypted content (the Plaintext). For example, the JSON Web Token (JWT) [JWT] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Token (JWT),” May 2013.) specification uses the cty value JWT to indicate that the Plaintext is a JSON Web Token (JWT). Content type values that are not understood SHOULD be ignored. The cty value is a case sensitive string. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL.
The values used for the cty header parameter come from the same value space as the typ header parameter, with the same rules applying.
TOC |
The apu (agreement PartyUInfo) value for key agreement algorithms using it (such as ECDH-ES), represented as a base64url encoded string. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL. When the alg value used identifies an algorithm for which apu is a parameter, this header parameter MUST be understood by implementations; otherwise, this parameter MUST be omitted.
TOC |
The crit (critical) header parameter indicates that extensions to [[ this specification ]] are being used that MUST be understood and processed. Its value is an array listing the header parameter names defined by those extensions that are used in the JWE Header. If any of the listed extension header parameters are not understood and supported by the receiver, it MUST reject the JWE. Senders MUST NOT include header parameter names defined by [[ this specification ]], duplicate names, or names that do not occur as header parameter names within the JWE Header in the crit list. Senders MUST not use the empty list [] as the crit value. Recipients MAY reject the JWE if the critical list contains any header parameter names defined by [[ this specification ]] or any other constraints on its use are violated. This header parameter MUST be integrity protected, and therefore MUST occur only with the JWE Protected Header, when used. Use of this header parameter is OPTIONAL. This header parameter MUST be understood by implementations.
An example use, along with a hypothetical exp (expiration-time) field is:
{"alg":"RSA-OAEP", "enc":"A256GCM", "crit":["exp"], "exp":1363284000 }
TOC |
Additional Header Parameter Names can be defined by those using JWEs. However, in order to prevent collisions, any new Header Parameter Name SHOULD either be registered in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.) or be a Public Name: a value that contains a Collision Resistant Namespace. In each case, the definer of the name or value needs to take reasonable precautions to make sure they are in control of the part of the namespace they use to define the Header Parameter Name.
New header parameters should be introduced sparingly, as they can result in non-interoperable JWEs.
TOC |
A producer and consumer of a JWE may agree to use Header Parameter Names that are Private Names: names that are not Reserved Names Section 4.1 (Reserved Header Parameter Names) or Public Names Section 4.2 (Public Header Parameter Names). Unlike Public Names, Private Names are subject to collision and should be used with caution.
TOC |
TOC |
The message encryption process is as follows. The order of the steps is not significant in cases where there are no dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps.
TOC |
The message decryption process is the reverse of the encryption process. The order of the steps is not significant in cases where there are no dependencies between the inputs and outputs of the steps. If any of these steps fails, the JWE MUST be rejected.
TOC |
Processing a JWE inevitably requires comparing known strings to values in JSON objects. For example, in checking what the encryption method is, the Unicode string encoding enc will be checked against the member names in the JWE Header to see if there is a matching Header Parameter Name.
Comparisons between JSON strings and other Unicode strings MUST be performed by comparing Unicode code points without normalization as specified in the String Comparison Rules in Section 5.3 of [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.).
TOC |
JWE uses cryptographic algorithms to encrypt the Plaintext and the Content Encryption Key (CEK) and to provide integrity protection for the JWE Protected Header and JWE Ciphertext. The JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) specification specifies a set of cryptographic algorithms and identifiers to be used with this specification and defines registries for additional such algorithms. Specifically, Section 4.1 specifies a set of alg (algorithm) header parameter values and Section 4.2 specifies a set of enc (encryption method) header parameter values intended for use this specification. It also describes the semantics and operations that are specific to these algorithms.
TOC |
JWE supports three forms of Content Encryption Key (CEK) encryption:
See the algorithms registered for enc usage in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms registry [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) and Section 4.1 of the JSON Web Algorithms (JWA) [JWA] (Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” May 2013.) specification for lists of encryption algorithms that can be used for CEK encryption.
TOC |
It is necessary for the recipient of a JWE to be able to determine the key that was employed for the encryption operation. The key employed can be identified using the Header Parameter methods described in Section 4.1 (Reserved Header Parameter Names) or can be identified using methods that are outside the scope of this specification. Specifically, the Header Parameters jku, jwk, x5u, x5t, x5c, and kid can be used to identify the key used. The sender SHOULD include sufficient information in the Header Parameters to identify the key used, unless the application uses another means or convention to determine the key used. Recipients MUST reject the input when the key used cannot be determined.
TOC |
The JWE JSON Serialization represents encrypted content as a JSON object. Unlike the JWE Compact Serialization, content using the JWE JSON Serialization can be encrypted to more than one recipient.
The representation is closely related to that used in the JWE Compact Serialization, with the following differences for the JWE JSON Serialization:
The syntax of a JWE using the JWE JSON Serialization is as follows:
{"protected":<integrity-protected shared header contents>", "unprotected":<non-integrity-protected shared header contents>", "recipients":[ {"header":"<per-recipient unprotected header 1 contents>", "encrypted_key":"<encrypted key 1 contents>"}, ... {"header":"<per-recipient unprotected header N contents>", "encrypted_key":"<encrypted key N contents>"}], "iv":"<initialization vector contents>", "ciphertext":"<ciphertext contents>", "tag":"<authentication tag contents>" }
Of these members, only the ciphertext member MUST be present. The iv, tag, and encrypted_key members MUST be present when corresponding JWE Initialization Vector, JWE Authentication Tag, and JWE Encrypted Key values are non-empty. The recipients member MUST be present when any header or encrypted_key members are needed for recipients. At least one of the header, protected, and unprotected members MUST be present so that alg and enc header parameter values are conveyed for each recipient computation.
The contents of the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and Encoded JWE Authentication Tag values are exactly as defined in the rest of this specification. They are interpreted and validated in the same manner, with each corresponding Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, Encoded JWE Ciphertext, Encoded JWE Authentication Tag, and set of header parameter values being created and validated together. The JWE Header values used are the union of the header parameters in the protected, unprotected, and corresponding header members, as described earlier.
Each JWE Encrypted Key value is computed using the parameters of the corresponding JWE Header value in the same manner as for the JWE Compact Serialization. This has the desirable property that each Encoded JWE Encrypted Key value in the recipients array is identical to the value that would have been computed for the same parameter in the JWE Compact Serialization. Likewise, the JWE Ciphertext and JWE Authentication Tag values match those produced for the JWE Compact Serialization, provided that the Encoded JWE Header value (which represents the integrity-protected header parameter values) matches that used in the JWE Compact Serialization.
All recipients use the same JWE Protected Header, JWE Initialization Vector, JWE Ciphertext, and JWE Authentication Tag values, resulting in potentially significant space savings if the message is large. Therefore, all header parameters that specify the treatment of the Plaintext value MUST be the same for all recipients. This primarily means that the enc (encryption method) header parameter value in the JWE Header for each recipient and any parameters of that algorithm MUST be the same.
See Appendix A.4 (Example JWE Using JWE JSON Serialization) for an example of computing a JWE using the JWE JSON Serialization.
TOC |
The JWE Compact Serialization is mandatory to implement. Implementation of the JWE JSON Serialization is OPTIONAL.
TOC |
TOC |
This specification registers the Header Parameter Names defined in Section 4.1 (Reserved Header Parameter Names) in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.).
TOC |
TOC |
TOC |
This specification registers the JWE and JWE+JSON type values in the IANA JSON Web Signature and Encryption Type Values registry [JWS] (Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” May 2013.):
TOC |
TOC |
This specification registers the application/jwe and application/jwe+json Media Types [RFC2046] (Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” November 1996.) in the MIME Media Type registry [RFC4288] (Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” December 2005.) to indicate, respectively, that the content is a JWE using the JWE Compact Serialization or a JWE using the JWE JSON Serialization.
TOC |
All of the security issues faced by any cryptographic application must be faced by a JWS/JWE/JWK agent. Among these issues are protecting the user's private and symmetric keys, preventing various attacks, and helping the user avoid mistakes such as inadvertently encrypting a message for the wrong recipient. The entire list of security considerations is beyond the scope of this document.
All the security considerations in the JWS specification also apply to this specification. Likewise, all the security considerations in XML Encryption 1.1 (Eastlake, D., Reagle, J., Roessler, T., and F. Hirsch, “XML Encryption Syntax and Processing Version 1.1,” March 2012.) [W3C.CR‑xmlenc‑core1‑20120313] also apply, other than those that are XML specific.
When decrypting, particular care must be taken not to allow the JWE recipient to be used as an oracle for decrypting messages. RFC 3218 (Rescorla, E., “Preventing the Million Message Attack on Cryptographic Message Syntax,” January 2002.) [RFC3218] should be consulted for specific countermeasures to attacks on RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5. An attacker might modify the contents of the alg parameter from RSA-OAEP to RSA1_5 in order to generate a formatting error that can be detected and used to recover the CEK even if RSAES OAEP was used to encrypt the CEK. It is therefore particularly important to report all formatting errors to the CEK, Additional Authenticated Data, or ciphertext as a single error when the JWE is rejected.
TOC |
TOC |
[ITU.X690.1994] | International Telecommunications Union, “Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER),” ITU-T Recommendation X.690, 1994. |
[JWA] | Jones, M., “JSON Web Algorithms (JWA),” draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms (work in progress), May 2013 (HTML). |
[JWK] | Jones, M., “JSON Web Key (JWK),” draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key (work in progress), May 2013 (HTML). |
[JWS] | Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Signature (JWS),” draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature (work in progress), May 2013 (HTML). |
[RFC1421] | Linn, J., “Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part I: Message Encryption and Authentication Procedures,” RFC 1421, February 1993 (TXT). |
[RFC1951] | Deutsch, P., “DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3,” RFC 1951, May 1996 (TXT, PS, PDF). |
[RFC2046] | Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” RFC 2046, November 1996 (TXT). |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC2818] | Rescorla, E., “HTTP Over TLS,” RFC 2818, May 2000 (TXT). |
[RFC3629] | Yergeau, F., “UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646,” STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003 (TXT). |
[RFC3986] | Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC4086] | Eastlake, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, “Randomness Requirements for Security,” BCP 106, RFC 4086, June 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC4288] | Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” RFC 4288, December 2005 (TXT). |
[RFC4627] | Crockford, D., “The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON),” RFC 4627, July 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC4648] | Josefsson, S., “The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings,” RFC 4648, October 2006 (TXT). |
[RFC5246] | Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2,” RFC 5246, August 2008 (TXT). |
[RFC5280] | Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, “Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” RFC 5280, May 2008 (TXT). |
[W3C.CR-xmlenc-core1-20120313] | Eastlake, D., Reagle, J., Roessler, T., and F. Hirsch, “XML Encryption Syntax and Processing Version 1.1,” World Wide Web Consortium CR CR-xmlenc-core1-20120313, March 2012 (HTML). |
TOC |
[I-D.mcgrew-aead-aes-cbc-hmac-sha2] | McGrew, D. and K. Paterson, “Authenticated Encryption with AES-CBC and HMAC-SHA,” draft-mcgrew-aead-aes-cbc-hmac-sha2-01 (work in progress), October 2012 (TXT). |
[I-D.rescorla-jsms] | Rescorla, E. and J. Hildebrand, “JavaScript Message Security Format,” draft-rescorla-jsms-00 (work in progress), March 2011 (TXT). |
[JSE] | Bradley, J. and N. Sakimura (editor), “JSON Simple Encryption,” September 2010. |
[JWT] | Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, “JSON Web Token (JWT),” draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token (work in progress), May 2013 (HTML). |
[RFC3218] | Rescorla, E., “Preventing the Million Message Attack on Cryptographic Message Syntax,” RFC 3218, January 2002 (TXT). |
[RFC4122] | Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace,” RFC 4122, July 2005 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC5652] | Housley, R., “Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS),” STD 70, RFC 5652, September 2009 (TXT). |
TOC |
This section provides examples of JWE computations.
TOC |
This example encrypts the plaintext "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination." to the recipient using RSAES OAEP and AES GCM. The representation of this plaintext is:
[84, 104, 101, 32, 116, 114, 117, 101, 32, 115, 105, 103, 110, 32, 111, 102, 32, 105, 110, 116, 101, 108, 108, 105, 103, 101, 110, 99, 101, 32, 105, 115, 32, 110, 111, 116, 32, 107, 110, 111, 119, 108, 101, 100, 103, 101, 32, 98, 117, 116, 32, 105, 109, 97, 103, 105, 110, 97, 116, 105, 111, 110, 46]
TOC |
The following example JWE Header declares that:
{"alg":"RSA-OAEP","enc":"A256GCM"}
TOC |
Base64url encoding the octets of the UTF-8 representation of the JWE Header yields this Encoded JWE Header value:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZHQ00ifQ
TOC |
Generate a 256 bit random Content Encryption Key (CEK). In this example, the value is:
[177, 161, 244, 128, 84, 143, 225, 115, 63, 180, 3, 255, 107, 154, 212, 246, 138, 7, 110, 91, 112, 46, 34, 105, 47, 130, 203, 46, 122, 234, 64, 252]
TOC |
Encrypt the CEK with the recipient's public key using the RSAES OAEP algorithm to produce the JWE Encrypted Key. In this example, the RSA key parameters are:
Parameter Name | Value |
---|---|
Modulus | [161, 168, 84, 34, 133, 176, 208, 173, 46, 176, 163, 110, 57, 30, 135, 227, 9, 31, 226, 128, 84, 92, 116, 241, 70, 248, 27, 227, 193, 62, 5, 91, 241, 145, 224, 205, 141, 176, 184, 133, 239, 43, 81, 103, 9, 161, 153, 157, 179, 104, 123, 51, 189, 34, 152, 69, 97, 69, 78, 93, 140, 131, 87, 182, 169, 101, 92, 142, 3, 22, 167, 8, 212, 56, 35, 79, 210, 222, 192, 208, 252, 49, 109, 138, 173, 253, 210, 166, 201, 63, 102, 74, 5, 158, 41, 90, 144, 108, 160, 79, 10, 89, 222, 231, 172, 31, 227, 197, 0, 19, 72, 81, 138, 78, 136, 221, 121, 118, 196, 17, 146, 10, 244, 188, 72, 113, 55, 221, 162, 217, 171, 27, 57, 233, 210, 101, 236, 154, 199, 56, 138, 239, 101, 48, 198, 186, 202, 160, 76, 111, 234, 71, 57, 183, 5, 211, 171, 136, 126, 64, 40, 75, 58, 89, 244, 254, 107, 84, 103, 7, 236, 69, 163, 18, 180, 251, 58, 153, 46, 151, 174, 12, 103, 197, 181, 161, 162, 55, 250, 235, 123, 110, 17, 11, 158, 24, 47, 133, 8, 199, 235, 107, 126, 130, 246, 73, 195, 20, 108, 202, 176, 214, 187, 45, 146, 182, 118, 54, 32, 200, 61, 201, 71, 243, 1, 255, 131, 84, 37, 111, 211, 168, 228, 45, 192, 118, 27, 197, 235, 232, 36, 10, 230, 248, 190, 82, 182, 140, 35, 204, 108, 190, 253, 186, 186, 27] |
Exponent | [1, 0, 1] |
Private Exponent | [144, 183, 109, 34, 62, 134, 108, 57, 44, 252, 10, 66, 73, 54, 16, 181, 233, 92, 54, 219, 101, 42, 35, 178, 63, 51, 43, 92, 119, 136, 251, 41, 53, 23, 191, 164, 164, 60, 88, 227, 229, 152, 228, 213, 149, 228, 169, 237, 104, 71, 151, 75, 88, 252, 216, 77, 251, 231, 28, 97, 88, 193, 215, 202, 248, 216, 121, 195, 211, 245, 250, 112, 71, 243, 61, 129, 95, 39, 244, 122, 225, 217, 169, 211, 165, 48, 253, 220, 59, 122, 219, 42, 86, 223, 32, 236, 39, 48, 103, 78, 122, 216, 187, 88, 176, 89, 24, 1, 42, 177, 24, 99, 142, 170, 1, 146, 43, 3, 108, 64, 194, 121, 182, 95, 187, 134, 71, 88, 96, 134, 74, 131, 167, 69, 106, 143, 121, 27, 72, 44, 245, 95, 39, 194, 179, 175, 203, 122, 16, 112, 183, 17, 200, 202, 31, 17, 138, 156, 184, 210, 157, 184, 154, 131, 128, 110, 12, 85, 195, 122, 241, 79, 251, 229, 183, 117, 21, 123, 133, 142, 220, 153, 9, 59, 57, 105, 81, 255, 138, 77, 82, 54, 62, 216, 38, 249, 208, 17, 197, 49, 45, 19, 232, 157, 251, 131, 137, 175, 72, 126, 43, 229, 69, 179, 117, 82, 157, 213, 83, 35, 57, 210, 197, 252, 171, 143, 194, 11, 47, 163, 6, 253, 75, 252, 96, 11, 187, 84, 130, 210, 7, 121, 78, 91, 79, 57, 251, 138, 132, 220, 60, 224, 173, 56, 224, 201] |
The resulting JWE Encrypted Key value is:
[56, 163, 154, 192, 58, 53, 222, 4, 105, 218, 136, 218, 29, 94, 203, 22, 150, 92, 129, 94, 211, 232, 53, 89, 41, 60, 138, 56, 196, 216, 82, 98, 168, 76, 37, 73, 70, 7, 36, 8, 191, 100, 136, 196, 244, 220, 145, 158, 138, 155, 4, 117, 141, 230, 199, 247, 173, 45, 182, 214, 74, 177, 107, 211, 153, 11, 205, 196, 171, 226, 162, 128, 171, 182, 13, 237, 239, 99, 193, 4, 91, 219, 121, 223, 107, 167, 61, 119, 228, 173, 156, 137, 134, 200, 80, 219, 74, 253, 56, 185, 91, 177, 34, 158, 89, 154, 205, 96, 55, 18, 138, 43, 96, 218, 215, 128, 124, 75, 138, 243, 85, 25, 109, 117, 140, 26, 155, 249, 67, 167, 149, 231, 100, 6, 41, 65, 214, 251, 232, 87, 72, 40, 182, 149, 154, 168, 31, 193, 126, 215, 89, 28, 111, 219, 125, 182, 139, 235, 195, 197, 23, 234, 55, 58, 63, 180, 68, 202, 206, 149, 75, 205, 248, 176, 67, 39, 178, 60, 98, 193, 32, 238, 122, 96, 158, 222, 57, 183, 111, 210, 55, 188, 215, 206, 180, 166, 150, 166, 106, 250, 55, 229, 72, 40, 69, 214, 216, 104, 23, 40, 135, 212, 28, 127, 41, 80, 175, 174, 168, 115, 171, 197, 89, 116, 92, 103, 246, 83, 216, 182, 176, 84, 37, 147, 35, 45, 219, 172, 99, 226, 233, 73, 37, 124, 42, 72, 49, 242, 35, 127, 184, 134, 117, 114, 135, 206]
TOC |
Base64url encode the JWE Encrypted Key to produce the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key. This result (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
OKOawDo13gRp2ojaHV7LFpZcgV7T6DVZKTyKOMTYUmKoTCVJRgckCL9kiMT03JGe ipsEdY3mx_etLbbWSrFr05kLzcSr4qKAq7YN7e9jwQRb23nfa6c9d-StnImGyFDb Sv04uVuxIp5Zms1gNxKKK2Da14B8S4rzVRltdYwam_lDp5XnZAYpQdb76FdIKLaV mqgfwX7XWRxv2322i-vDxRfqNzo_tETKzpVLzfiwQyeyPGLBIO56YJ7eObdv0je8 1860ppamavo35UgoRdbYaBcoh9QcfylQr66oc6vFWXRcZ_ZT2LawVCWTIy3brGPi 6UklfCpIMfIjf7iGdXKHzg
TOC |
Generate a random 96 bit JWE Initialization Vector. In this example, the value is:
[227, 197, 117, 252, 2, 219, 233, 68, 180, 225, 77, 219]
Base64url encoding this value yields the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector value:
48V1_ALb6US04U3b
TOC |
Let the Additional Authenticated Data encryption parameter be the octets of the ASCII representation of the Encoded JWE Header value. This AAD value is:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 83, 85, 48, 69, 116, 84, 48, 70, 70, 85, 67, 73, 115, 73, 109, 86, 117, 89, 121, 73, 54, 73, 107, 69, 121, 78, 84, 90, 72, 81, 48, 48, 105, 102, 81]
TOC |
Encrypt the Plaintext with AES GCM using the CEK as the encryption key, the JWE Initialization Vector, and the Additional Authenticated Data value above, requesting a 128 bit Authentication Tag output. The resulting Ciphertext is:
[229, 236, 166, 241, 53, 191, 115, 196, 174, 43, 73, 109, 39, 122, 233, 96, 140, 206, 120, 52, 51, 237, 48, 11, 190, 219, 186, 80, 111, 104, 50, 142, 47, 167, 59, 61, 181, 127, 196, 21, 40, 82, 242, 32, 123, 143, 168, 226, 73, 216, 176, 144, 138, 247, 106, 60, 16, 205, 160, 109, 64, 63, 192]
The resulting Authentication Tag value is:
[92, 80, 104, 49, 133, 25, 161, 215, 173, 101, 219, 211, 136, 91, 210, 145]
TOC |
Base64url encode the Ciphertext to create the Encoded JWE Ciphertext. This result (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
5eym8TW_c8SuK0ltJ3rpYIzOeDQz7TALvtu6UG9oMo4vpzs9tX_EFShS8iB7j6ji SdiwkIr3ajwQzaBtQD_A
TOC |
Base64url encode the Authentication Tag to create the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag. This result is:
XFBoMYUZodetZdvTiFvSkQ
TOC |
Assemble the final representation: The Compact Serialization of this result is the concatenation of the Encoded JWE Header, the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, the Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag in that order, with the five strings being separated by four period ('.') characters.
The final result in this example (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0EtT0FFUCIsImVuYyI6IkEyNTZHQ00ifQ. OKOawDo13gRp2ojaHV7LFpZcgV7T6DVZKTyKOMTYUmKoTCVJRgckCL9kiMT03JGe ipsEdY3mx_etLbbWSrFr05kLzcSr4qKAq7YN7e9jwQRb23nfa6c9d-StnImGyFDb Sv04uVuxIp5Zms1gNxKKK2Da14B8S4rzVRltdYwam_lDp5XnZAYpQdb76FdIKLaV mqgfwX7XWRxv2322i-vDxRfqNzo_tETKzpVLzfiwQyeyPGLBIO56YJ7eObdv0je8 1860ppamavo35UgoRdbYaBcoh9QcfylQr66oc6vFWXRcZ_ZT2LawVCWTIy3brGPi 6UklfCpIMfIjf7iGdXKHzg. 48V1_ALb6US04U3b. 5eym8TW_c8SuK0ltJ3rpYIzOeDQz7TALvtu6UG9oMo4vpzs9tX_EFShS8iB7j6ji SdiwkIr3ajwQzaBtQD_A. XFBoMYUZodetZdvTiFvSkQ
TOC |
This example illustrates the process of creating a JWE with RSA OAEP and AES GCM. These results can be used to validate JWE decryption implementations for these algorithms. Note that since the RSAES OAEP computation includes random values, the encryption results above will not be completely reproducible. However, since the AES GCM computation is deterministic, the JWE Encrypted Ciphertext values will be the same for all encryptions performed using these inputs.
TOC |
This example encrypts the plaintext "Live long and prosper." to the recipient using RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 and AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256. The representation of this plaintext is:
[76, 105, 118, 101, 32, 108, 111, 110, 103, 32, 97, 110, 100, 32, 112, 114, 111, 115, 112, 101, 114, 46]
TOC |
The following example JWE Header (with line breaks for display purposes only) declares that:
{"alg":"RSA1_5","enc":"A128CBC-HS256"}
TOC |
Base64url encoding the octets of the UTF-8 representation of the JWE Header yields this Encoded JWE Header value:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0ExXzUiLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0
TOC |
Generate a 256 bit random Content Encryption Key (CEK). In this example, the key value is:
[4, 211, 31, 197, 84, 157, 252, 254, 11, 100, 157, 250, 63, 170, 106, 206, 107, 124, 212, 45, 111, 107, 9, 219, 200, 177, 0, 240, 143, 156, 44, 207]
TOC |
Encrypt the CEK with the recipient's public key using the RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 algorithm to produce the JWE Encrypted Key. In this example, the RSA key parameters are:
Parameter Name | Value |
---|---|
Modulus | [177, 119, 33, 13, 164, 30, 108, 121, 207, 136, 107, 242, 12, 224, 19, 226, 198, 134, 17, 71, 173, 75, 42, 61, 48, 162, 206, 161, 97, 108, 185, 234, 226, 219, 118, 206, 118, 5, 169, 224, 60, 181, 90, 85, 51, 123, 6, 224, 4, 122, 29, 230, 151, 12, 244, 127, 121, 25, 4, 85, 220, 144, 215, 110, 130, 17, 68, 228, 129, 138, 7, 130, 231, 40, 212, 214, 17, 179, 28, 124, 151, 178, 207, 20, 14, 154, 222, 113, 176, 24, 198, 73, 211, 113, 9, 33, 178, 80, 13, 25, 21, 25, 153, 212, 206, 67, 154, 147, 70, 194, 192, 183, 160, 83, 98, 236, 175, 85, 23, 97, 75, 199, 177, 73, 145, 50, 253, 206, 32, 179, 254, 236, 190, 82, 73, 67, 129, 253, 252, 220, 108, 136, 138, 11, 192, 1, 36, 239, 228, 55, 81, 113, 17, 25, 140, 63, 239, 146, 3, 172, 96, 60, 227, 233, 64, 255, 224, 173, 225, 228, 229, 92, 112, 72, 99, 97, 26, 87, 187, 123, 46, 50, 90, 202, 117, 73, 10, 153, 47, 224, 178, 163, 77, 48, 46, 154, 33, 148, 34, 228, 33, 172, 216, 89, 46, 225, 127, 68, 146, 234, 30, 147, 54, 146, 5, 133, 45, 78, 254, 85, 55, 75, 213, 86, 194, 218, 215, 163, 189, 194, 54, 6, 83, 36, 18, 153, 53, 7, 48, 89, 35, 66, 144, 7, 65, 154, 13, 97, 75, 55, 230, 132, 3, 13, 239, 71] |
Exponent | [1, 0, 1] |
Private Exponent | [84, 80, 150, 58, 165, 235, 242, 123, 217, 55, 38, 154, 36, 181, 221, 156, 211, 215, 100, 164, 90, 88, 40, 228, 83, 148, 54, 122, 4, 16, 165, 48, 76, 194, 26, 107, 51, 53, 179, 165, 31, 18, 198, 173, 78, 61, 56, 97, 252, 158, 140, 80, 63, 25, 223, 156, 36, 203, 214, 252, 120, 67, 180, 167, 3, 82, 243, 25, 97, 214, 83, 133, 69, 16, 104, 54, 160, 200, 41, 83, 164, 187, 70, 153, 111, 234, 242, 158, 175, 28, 198, 48, 211, 45, 148, 58, 23, 62, 227, 74, 52, 117, 42, 90, 41, 249, 130, 154, 80, 119, 61, 26, 193, 40, 125, 10, 152, 174, 227, 225, 205, 32, 62, 66, 6, 163, 100, 99, 219, 19, 253, 25, 105, 80, 201, 29, 252, 157, 237, 69, 1, 80, 171, 167, 20, 196, 156, 109, 249, 88, 0, 3, 152, 38, 165, 72, 87, 6, 152, 71, 156, 214, 16, 71, 30, 82, 51, 103, 76, 218, 63, 9, 84, 163, 249, 91, 215, 44, 238, 85, 101, 240, 148, 1, 82, 224, 91, 135, 105, 127, 84, 171, 181, 152, 210, 183, 126, 24, 46, 196, 90, 173, 38, 245, 219, 186, 222, 27, 240, 212, 194, 15, 66, 135, 226, 178, 190, 52, 245, 74, 65, 224, 81, 100, 85, 25, 204, 165, 203, 187, 175, 84, 100, 82, 15, 11, 23, 202, 151, 107, 54, 41, 207, 3, 136, 229, 134, 131, 93, 139, 50, 182, 204, 93, 130, 89] |
The resulting JWE Encrypted Key value is:
[80, 104, 72, 58, 11, 130, 236, 139, 132, 189, 255, 205, 61, 86, 151, 176, 99, 40, 44, 233, 176, 189, 205, 70, 202, 169, 72, 40, 226, 181, 156, 223, 120, 156, 115, 232, 150, 209, 145, 133, 104, 112, 237, 156, 116, 250, 65, 102, 212, 210, 103, 240, 177, 61, 93, 40, 71, 231, 223, 226, 240, 157, 15, 31, 150, 89, 200, 215, 198, 203, 108, 70, 117, 66, 212, 238, 193, 205, 23, 161, 169, 218, 243, 203, 128, 214, 127, 253, 215, 139, 43, 17, 135, 103, 179, 220, 28, 2, 212, 206, 131, 158, 128, 66, 62, 240, 78, 186, 141, 125, 132, 227, 60, 137, 43, 31, 152, 199, 54, 72, 34, 212, 115, 11, 152, 101, 70, 42, 219, 233, 142, 66, 151, 250, 126, 146, 141, 216, 190, 73, 50, 177, 146, 5, 52, 247, 28, 197, 21, 59, 170, 247, 181, 89, 131, 241, 169, 182, 246, 99, 15, 36, 102, 166, 182, 172, 197, 136, 230, 120, 60, 58, 219, 243, 149, 94, 222, 150, 154, 194, 110, 227, 225, 112, 39, 89, 233, 112, 207, 211, 241, 124, 174, 69, 221, 179, 107, 196, 225, 127, 167, 112, 226, 12, 242, 16, 24, 28, 120, 182, 244, 213, 244, 153, 194, 162, 69, 160, 244, 248, 63, 165, 141, 4, 207, 249, 193, 79, 131, 0, 169, 233, 127, 167, 101, 151, 125, 56, 112, 111, 248, 29, 232, 90, 29, 147, 110, 169, 146, 114, 165, 204, 71, 136, 41, 252]
TOC |
Base64url encode the JWE Encrypted Key to produce the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key. This result (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
UGhIOguC7IuEvf_NPVaXsGMoLOmwvc1GyqlIKOK1nN94nHPoltGRhWhw7Zx0-kFm 1NJn8LE9XShH59_i8J0PH5ZZyNfGy2xGdULU7sHNF6Gp2vPLgNZ__deLKxGHZ7Pc HALUzoOegEI-8E66jX2E4zyJKx-YxzZIItRzC5hlRirb6Y5Cl_p-ko3YvkkysZIF NPccxRU7qve1WYPxqbb2Yw8kZqa2rMWI5ng8OtvzlV7elprCbuPhcCdZ6XDP0_F8 rkXds2vE4X-ncOIM8hAYHHi29NX0mcKiRaD0-D-ljQTP-cFPgwCp6X-nZZd9OHBv -B3oWh2TbqmScqXMR4gp_A
TOC |
Generate a random 128 bit JWE Initialization Vector. In this example, the value is:
[3, 22, 60, 12, 43, 67, 104, 105, 108, 108, 105, 99, 111, 116, 104, 101]
Base64url encoding this value yields the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector value:
AxY8DCtDaGlsbGljb3RoZQ
TOC |
Let the Additional Authenticated Data encryption parameter be the octets of the ASCII representation of the Encoded JWE Header value. This AAD value is:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 83, 85, 48, 69, 120, 88, 122, 85, 105, 76, 67, 74, 108, 98, 109, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 81, 48, 74, 68, 76, 85, 104, 84, 77, 106, 85, 50, 73, 110, 48]
TOC |
Encrypt the Plaintext with AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 using the CEK as the encryption key, the JWE Initialization Vector, and the Additional Authenticated Data value above. The steps for doing this using the values from Appendix A.3 (Example JWE using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM) are detailed in Appendix B (Example AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 Computation). The resulting Ciphertext is:
[40, 57, 83, 181, 119, 33, 133, 148, 198, 185, 243, 24, 152, 230, 6, 75, 129, 223, 127, 19, 210, 82, 183, 230, 168, 33, 215, 104, 143, 112, 56, 102]
The resulting Authentication Tag value is:
[246, 17, 244, 190, 4, 95, 98, 3, 231, 0, 115, 157, 242, 203, 100, 191]
TOC |
Base64url encode the Ciphertext to create the Encoded JWE Ciphertext. This result is:
KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY
TOC |
Base64url encode the Authentication Tag to create the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag. This result is:
9hH0vgRfYgPnAHOd8stkvw
TOC |
Assemble the final representation: The Compact Serialization of this result is the concatenation of the Encoded JWE Header, the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, the Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag in that order, with the five strings being separated by four period ('.') characters.
The final result in this example (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
eyJhbGciOiJSU0ExXzUiLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0. UGhIOguC7IuEvf_NPVaXsGMoLOmwvc1GyqlIKOK1nN94nHPoltGRhWhw7Zx0-kFm 1NJn8LE9XShH59_i8J0PH5ZZyNfGy2xGdULU7sHNF6Gp2vPLgNZ__deLKxGHZ7Pc HALUzoOegEI-8E66jX2E4zyJKx-YxzZIItRzC5hlRirb6Y5Cl_p-ko3YvkkysZIF NPccxRU7qve1WYPxqbb2Yw8kZqa2rMWI5ng8OtvzlV7elprCbuPhcCdZ6XDP0_F8 rkXds2vE4X-ncOIM8hAYHHi29NX0mcKiRaD0-D-ljQTP-cFPgwCp6X-nZZd9OHBv -B3oWh2TbqmScqXMR4gp_A. AxY8DCtDaGlsbGljb3RoZQ. KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY. 9hH0vgRfYgPnAHOd8stkvw
TOC |
This example illustrates the process of creating a JWE with RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 and AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2. These results can be used to validate JWE decryption implementations for these algorithms. Note that since the RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 computation includes random values, the encryption results above will not be completely reproducible. However, since the AES CBC computation is deterministic, the JWE Encrypted Ciphertext values will be the same for all encryptions performed using these inputs.
TOC |
This example encrypts the plaintext "Live long and prosper." to the recipient using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM. The representation of this plaintext is:
[76, 105, 118, 101, 32, 108, 111, 110, 103, 32, 97, 110, 100, 32, 112, 114, 111, 115, 112, 101, 114, 46]
TOC |
The following example JWE Header declares that:
{"alg":"A128KW","enc":"A128CBC-HS256"}
TOC |
Base64url encoding the octets of the UTF-8 representation of the JWE Header yields this Encoded JWE Header value:
eyJhbGciOiJBMTI4S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0
TOC |
Generate a 256 bit random Content Encryption Key (CEK). In this example, the value is:
[4, 211, 31, 197, 84, 157, 252, 254, 11, 100, 157, 250, 63, 170, 106, 206, 107, 124, 212, 45, 111, 107, 9, 219, 200, 177, 0, 240, 143, 156, 44, 207]
TOC |
Encrypt the CEK with the shared symmetric key using the AES Key Wrap algorithm to produce the JWE Encrypted Key. In this example, the shared symmetric key value is:
[25, 172, 32, 130, 225, 114, 26, 181, 138, 106, 254, 192, 95, 133, 74, 82]
The resulting JWE Encrypted Key value is:
[232, 160, 123, 211, 183, 76, 245, 132, 200, 128, 123, 75, 190, 216, 22, 67, 201, 138, 193, 186, 9, 91, 122, 31, 246, 90, 28, 139, 57, 3, 76, 124, 193, 11, 98, 37, 173, 61, 104, 57]
TOC |
Base64url encode the JWE Encrypted Key to produce the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key. This result is:
6KB707dM9YTIgHtLvtgWQ8mKwboJW3of9locizkDTHzBC2IlrT1oOQ
TOC |
Generate a random 128 bit JWE Initialization Vector. In this example, the value is:
[3, 22, 60, 12, 43, 67, 104, 105, 108, 108, 105, 99, 111, 116, 104, 101]
Base64url encoding this value yields the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector value:
AxY8DCtDaGlsbGljb3RoZQ
TOC |
Let the Additional Authenticated Data encryption parameter be the octets of the ASCII representation of the Encoded JWE Header value. This AAD value is:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 83, 49, 99, 105, 76, 67, 74, 108, 98, 109, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 81, 48, 74, 68, 76, 85, 104, 84, 77, 106, 85, 50, 73, 110, 48]
TOC |
Encrypt the Plaintext with AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 using the CEK as the encryption key, the JWE Initialization Vector, and the Additional Authenticated Data value above. The steps for doing this using the values from this example are detailed in Appendix B (Example AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 Computation). The resulting Ciphertext is:
[40, 57, 83, 181, 119, 33, 133, 148, 198, 185, 243, 24, 152, 230, 6, 75, 129, 223, 127, 19, 210, 82, 183, 230, 168, 33, 215, 104, 143, 112, 56, 102]
The resulting Authentication Tag value is:
[83, 73, 191, 98, 104, 205, 211, 128, 201, 189, 199, 133, 32, 38, 194, 85]
TOC |
Base64url encode the Ciphertext to create the Encoded JWE Ciphertext. This result is:
KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY
TOC |
Base64url encode the Authentication Tag to create the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag. This result is:
U0m_YmjN04DJvceFICbCVQ
TOC |
Assemble the final representation: The Compact Serialization of this result is the concatenation of the Encoded JWE Header, the Encoded JWE Encrypted Key, the Encoded JWE Initialization Vector, the Encoded JWE Ciphertext, and the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag in that order, with the five strings being separated by four period ('.') characters.
The final result in this example (with line breaks for display purposes only) is:
eyJhbGciOiJBMTI4S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0. 6KB707dM9YTIgHtLvtgWQ8mKwboJW3of9locizkDTHzBC2IlrT1oOQ. AxY8DCtDaGlsbGljb3RoZQ. KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY. U0m_YmjN04DJvceFICbCVQ
TOC |
This example illustrates the process of creating a JWE with symmetric key wrap and AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2. These results can be used to validate JWE decryption implementations for these algorithms. Also, since both the AES Key Wrap and AES GCM computations are deterministic, the resulting JWE value will be the same for all encryptions performed using these inputs. Since the computation is reproducible, these results can also be used to validate JWE encryption implementations for these algorithms.
TOC |
This section contains an example using the JWE JSON Serialization. This example demonstrates the capability for encrypting the same plaintext to multiple recipients.
Two recipients are present in this example. The algorithm and key used for the first recipient are the same as that used in Appendix A.2 (Example JWE using RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 and AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256). The algorithm and key used for the second recipient are the same as that used in Appendix A.3 (Example JWE using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM). The resulting JWE Encrypted Key values are therefore the same; those computations are not repeated here.
The Plaintext, the Content Encryption Key (CEK), Initialization Vector, and JWE Protected Header are shared by all recipients (which must be the case, since the Ciphertext and Authentication Tag are also shared).
TOC |
The first recipient uses the RSAES-PKCS1-V1_5 algorithm to encrypt the Content Encryption Key (CEK). The second uses RSAES OAEP to encrypt the CEK. Key ID values are supplied for both keys. The two per-recipient header values used to represent these algorithms and Key IDs are:
{"alg":"RSA1_5","kid":"2011-04-29"}
and:
{"alg":"A128KW","kid":"7"}
TOC |
The Plaintext is encrypted using the AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 algorithm to produce the common JWE Ciphertext and JWE Authentication Tag values. The JWE Protected Header value representing this is:
{"enc":"A128CBC-HS256"}
Base64url encoding the octets of the UTF-8 representation of the JWE Protected Header yields this Encoded JWE Protected Header value:
eyJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0
TOC |
This JWE uses the jku header parameter to reference a JWK Set. This is represented in the following JWE Unprotected Header value as:
{"jku":"https://server.example.com/keys.jwks"}
TOC |
Combining the per-recipient, protected, and unprotected header values supplied, the JWE Header values used for the first and second recipient respectively are:
{"alg":"RSA1_5", "kid":"2011-04-29", "enc":"A128CBC-HS256", "jku":"https://server.example.com/keys.jwks"}
and:
{"alg":"A128KW", "kid":"7", "enc":"A128CBC-HS256", "jku":"https://server.example.com/keys.jwks"}
TOC |
Let the Additional Authenticated Data encryption parameter be the octets of the ASCII representation of the Encoded JWE Protected Header value. This AAD value is:
[101, 121, 74, 108, 98, 109, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 81, 48, 74, 68, 76, 85, 104, 84, 77, 106, 85, 50, 73, 110, 48]
TOC |
Encrypt the Plaintext with AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 using the CEK as the encryption key, the JWE Initialization Vector, and the Additional Authenticated Data value above. The steps for doing this using the values from Appendix A.3 (Example JWE using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM) are detailed in Appendix B (Example AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 Computation). The resulting Ciphertext is:
[40, 57, 83, 181, 119, 33, 133, 148, 198, 185, 243, 24, 152, 230, 6, 75, 129, 223, 127, 19, 210, 82, 183, 230, 168, 33, 215, 104, 143, 112, 56, 102]
The resulting Authentication Tag value is:
[51, 63, 149, 60, 252, 148, 225, 25, 92, 185, 139, 245, 35, 2, 47, 207]
TOC |
Base64url encode the Ciphertext to create the Encoded JWE Ciphertext. This result is:
KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY
TOC |
Base64url encode the Authentication Tag to create the Encoded JWE Authentication Tag. This result is:
Mz-VPPyU4RlcuYv1IwIvzw
TOC |
The complete JSON Web Encryption JSON Serialization for these values is as follows (with line breaks for display purposes only):
{"protected": "eyJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2In0", "unprotected": {"jku":"https://server.example.com/keys.jwks"}, "recipients":[ {"header": {"alg":"RSA1_5"}, "encrypted_key": "UGhIOguC7IuEvf_NPVaXsGMoLOmwvc1GyqlIKOK1nN94nHPoltGRhWhw7Zx0- kFm1NJn8LE9XShH59_i8J0PH5ZZyNfGy2xGdULU7sHNF6Gp2vPLgNZ__deLKx GHZ7PcHALUzoOegEI-8E66jX2E4zyJKx-YxzZIItRzC5hlRirb6Y5Cl_p-ko3 YvkkysZIFNPccxRU7qve1WYPxqbb2Yw8kZqa2rMWI5ng8OtvzlV7elprCbuPh cCdZ6XDP0_F8rkXds2vE4X-ncOIM8hAYHHi29NX0mcKiRaD0-D-ljQTP-cFPg wCp6X-nZZd9OHBv-B3oWh2TbqmScqXMR4gp_A"}, {"header": {"alg":"A128KW"}, "encrypted_key": "6KB707dM9YTIgHtLvtgWQ8mKwboJW3of9locizkDTHzBC2IlrT1oOQ"}], "iv": "AxY8DCtDaGlsbGljb3RoZQ", "ciphertext": "KDlTtXchhZTGufMYmOYGS4HffxPSUrfmqCHXaI9wOGY", "tag": "Mz-VPPyU4RlcuYv1IwIvzw" }
TOC |
This example shows the steps in the AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 authenticated encryption computation using the values from the example in Appendix A.3 (Example JWE using AES Key Wrap and AES GCM). As described where this algorithm is defined in Sections 4.8 and 4.8.3 of JWA, the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 family of algorithms are implemented using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode with PKCS #5 padding to perform the encryption and an HMAC SHA-2 function to perform the integrity calculation - in this case, HMAC SHA-256.
TOC |
The 256 bit AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256 key K used in this example is:
[4, 211, 31, 197, 84, 157, 252, 254, 11, 100, 157, 250, 63, 170, 106, 206, 107, 124, 212, 45, 111, 107, 9, 219, 200, 177, 0, 240, 143, 156, 44, 207]
Use the first 128 bits of this key as the HMAC SHA-256 key MAC_KEY, which is:
[4, 211, 31, 197, 84, 157, 252, 254, 11, 100, 157, 250, 63, 170, 106, 206]
Use the last 128 bits of this key as the AES CBC key ENC_KEY, which is:
[107, 124, 212, 45, 111, 107, 9, 219, 200, 177, 0, 240, 143, 156, 44, 207]
Note that the MAC key comes before the encryption key in the input key K; this is in the opposite order of the algorithm names in the identifiers "AES_128_CBC_HMAC_SHA_256" and A128CBC-HS256.
TOC |
Encrypt the Plaintext with AES in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode using PKCS #5 padding using the ENC_KEY above. The Plaintext in this example is:
[76, 105, 118, 101, 32, 108, 111, 110, 103, 32, 97, 110, 100, 32, 112, 114, 111, 115, 112, 101, 114, 46]
The encryption result is as follows, which is the Ciphertext output:
[40, 57, 83, 181, 119, 33, 133, 148, 198, 185, 243, 24, 152, 230, 6, 75, 129, 223, 127, 19, 210, 82, 183, 230, 168, 33, 215, 104, 143, 112, 56, 102]
TOC |
The Additional Authenticated Data (AAD) in this example is:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 83, 49, 99, 105, 76, 67, 74, 108, 98, 109, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 81, 48, 74, 68, 76, 85, 104, 84, 77, 106, 85, 50, 73, 110, 48]
This AAD is 51 bytes long, which is 408 bits long. The octet string AL, which is the number of bits in AAD expressed as a big endian 64 bit unsigned integer is:
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 152]
TOC |
The Initialization Vector value used in this example is:
[3, 22, 60, 12, 43, 67, 104, 105, 108, 108, 105, 99, 111, 116, 104, 101]
TOC |
Concatenate the AAD, the Initialization Vector, the Ciphertext, and the AL value. The result of this concatenation is:
[101, 121, 74, 104, 98, 71, 99, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 83, 49, 99, 105, 76, 67, 74, 108, 98, 109, 77, 105, 79, 105, 74, 66, 77, 84, 73, 52, 81, 48, 74, 68, 76, 85, 104, 84, 77, 106, 85, 50, 73, 110, 48, 3, 22, 60, 12, 43, 67, 104, 105, 108, 108, 105, 99, 111, 116, 104, 101, 40, 57, 83, 181, 119, 33, 133, 148, 198, 185, 243, 24, 152, 230, 6, 75, 129, 223, 127, 19, 210, 82, 183, 230, 168, 33, 215, 104, 143, 112, 56, 102, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 152]
TOC |
Compute the HMAC SHA-256 of the concatenated value above. This result M is:
[83, 73, 191, 98, 104, 205, 211, 128, 201, 189, 199, 133, 32, 38, 194, 85, 9, 84, 229, 201, 219, 135, 44, 252, 145, 102, 179, 140, 105, 86, 229, 116]
TOC |
Use the first half (128 bits) of the HMAC output M as the Authentication Tag output T. This truncated value is:
[83, 73, 191, 98, 104, 205, 211, 128, 201, 189, 199, 133, 32, 38, 194, 85]
TOC |
Solutions for encrypting JSON content were also explored by JSON Simple Encryption (Bradley, J. and N. Sakimura (editor), “JSON Simple Encryption,” September 2010.) [JSE] and JavaScript Message Security Format (Rescorla, E. and J. Hildebrand, “JavaScript Message Security Format,” March 2011.) [I‑D.rescorla‑jsms], both of which significantly influenced this draft. This draft attempts to explicitly reuse as many of the relevant concepts from XML Encryption 1.1 (Eastlake, D., Reagle, J., Roessler, T., and F. Hirsch, “XML Encryption Syntax and Processing Version 1.1,” March 2012.) [W3C.CR‑xmlenc‑core1‑20120313] and RFC 5652 (Housley, R., “Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS),” September 2009.) [RFC5652] as possible, while utilizing simple compact JSON-based data structures.
Special thanks are due to John Bradley and Nat Sakimura for the discussions that helped inform the content of this specification and to Eric Rescorla and Joe Hildebrand for allowing the reuse of text from [I‑D.rescorla‑jsms] (Rescorla, E. and J. Hildebrand, “JavaScript Message Security Format,” March 2011.) in this document.
Thanks to Axel Nennker, Emmanuel Raviart, Brian Campbell, and Edmund Jay for validating the examples in this specification.
This specification is the work of the JOSE Working Group, which includes dozens of active and dedicated participants. In particular, the following individuals contributed ideas, feedback, and wording that influenced this specification:
Richard Barnes, John Bradley, Brian Campbell, Breno de Medeiros, Dick Hardt, Jeff Hodges, Edmund Jay, James Manger, Matt Miller, Tony Nadalin, Axel Nennker, Emmanuel Raviart, Nat Sakimura, Jim Schaad, Hannes Tschofenig, and Sean Turner.
Jim Schaad and Karen O'Donoghue chaired the JOSE working group and Sean Turner and Stephen Farrell served as Security area directors during the creation of this specification.
TOC |
[[ to be removed by the RFC editor before publication as an RFC ]]
-11
-10
-09
-08
-07
-06
-05
-04
-03
-02
-01
-00
TOC |
Michael B. Jones | |
Microsoft | |
Email: | mbj@microsoft.com |
URI: | http://self-issued.info/ |
Eric Rescorla | |
RTFM, Inc. | |
Email: | ekr@rtfm.com |
Joe Hildebrand | |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
Email: | jhildebr@cisco.com |